IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v67y2022i5id244-2020-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of pre-synchronisation with progestogen and eCG on reproductive activity in synchronised ewes during anoestrous season

Author

Listed:
  • B Guner

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey)

  • R Kulaksiz

    (Department of Reproduction and Artificial Insemination, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey)

  • N Saat

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey)

  • I Kisadere

    (Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey)

  • M Ozturkler

    (Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Letters, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey)

  • KY Dalginli

    (Department of Chemistry and Chemical Processing Technologies, Kars Vocational High School, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey)

  • SM Pancarci

    (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balikesir University, Balikesir, Turkey)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of pre-synchronisation on the occurrence of the oestrus and pregnancy rate after fixed time artificial insemination (FTAI) in synchronised ewes during the anoestrous season. Kivircik ewes (n = 84) were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups with (PRE; n = 42) or without (SYN; n = 42) pre-synchronisation. In the SYN group, the ewes were subjected to a 7-d short-term protocol (P4 insertion-6d-PGF2α-1d-P4 removal + eCG). In the PRE group, the same short-term protocol as in the SYN group was applied with 7 days apart for a pre-synchronised synchronisation protocol. A cervical FTAI was performed with fresh semen at 54 h after sponge removal. At the beginning of the synchronisation protocol, the oestrous response (66.7% vs. 0.0%) and cyclicity rates (64.3% vs. 14.3%) based on progesterone (P4) were higher in the PRE group compared to those in the SYN group, respectively (P < 0.01). However, the oestrous response after synchronisation was lower within 96 h (57.1% vs. 95.2%; P < 0.01) in the PRE group compared to that in the SYN group. Although the pregnancy rate after the FTAI was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the PRE group (14.3%) than the SYN group (35.7%), the overall pregnancy rate after natural mating was not different (95.2%) between the groups. In conclusion, the pre-synchronisation decreased the oestrous response leading to a lower pregnancy rate after the FTAI in the synchronised ewes during the anoestrous season. Thus, attention should be paid to two consecutive administrations of eCG in a pre-synchronisation and synchronisation protocol in ewes.

Suggested Citation

  • B Guner & R Kulaksiz & N Saat & I Kisadere & M Ozturkler & KY Dalginli & SM Pancarci, 2022. "Effect of pre-synchronisation with progestogen and eCG on reproductive activity in synchronised ewes during anoestrous season," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(5), pages 231-239.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:5:id:244-2020-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/244/2020-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/244/2020-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/244/2020-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/244/2020-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:67:y:2022:i:5:id:244-2020-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.