Author
Listed:
- Andrii Bilous
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Viktor Myroniuk
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Viktor Svynchuk
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Oleksandr Soshenskyi
- Oleksandr Lesnik
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)
- Yaroslav Kovbasa
(National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine)
Abstract
In January 2019 the forest industry in Ukraine adopted European standards for measuring and grading of round wood based on mid-point diameters, which caused major discrepancies from traditionally used estimates of timber volume using top diameters. To compare methods of merchantable wood volume estimation, we investigated the stem form inside bark for two dominant tree species in Ukraine, i.e. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and common oak (Quercus robur L.). We used tree stem measurements to fit stem profile equations, whereas simulation was applied to derive log taper. We found that Newnham's (1992) variable-exponent taper equation performed well for predicting stem taper for both tree species. Then, we simulated the structure of harvested wood, so that it replicated annual distribution of logs by their length and diameters. As a result, the average log taper was estimated at 0.836 / 0.855 cm.m-1 and 1.180 / 0.121 cm.m-1 for pine and oak, respectively. The study also indicated that log taper varied along stems. The higher rates of diameter decrease were found for butt logs, for which the taper was 2.5-3.5 times higher than its average for the whole stem. The results of our study ensure the stacked round wood volume conversion between estimates obtained using top and mid-point diameters.
Suggested Citation
Andrii Bilous & Viktor Myroniuk & Viktor Svynchuk & Oleksandr Soshenskyi & Oleksandr Lesnik & Yaroslav Kovbasa, 2021.
"Semi-empirical estimation of log taper using stem profile equations,"
Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(7), pages 318-327.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:7:id:209-2020-jfs
DOI: 10.17221/209/2020-JFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:67:y:2021:i:7:id:209-2020-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.