IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/econen/v4y2014i2p3-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurship and economic development: A literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Van Phuc

    (Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam)

Abstract

This paper makes a comprehensive review of entrepreneurship on economic development in economic theory. It indicates how entrepreneurship is crucial for economic development. The role of entrepreneurship on economic development originated from different understandings on the nature of economic system. It is argued that the role of the entrepreneur has been moved out of the neoclassical model because a crucial assumption of the model is that decision-making merely involves marginalist calculation to optimise production, based upon public information supplied by the price system. The explanation for the phenomenon of economic development depends on how we understand the nature of the market process. In this respect, the economics of entrepreneurship is different from mainstream economics. For mainstream economics, the market is generally characterised by equilibrium. For the economics of entrepreneurship, the market process is characterised by disequilibrium. The review of literature indicates that entrepreneurship has different essential features that all are critical to economic development and the market process. They are Kirzner’s arbitragers or Schumpeter’s innovators. They are Knight’s uncertainty-bearing people. They assume managerial or leadership roles and thus function as the main allocators of scarce resources in the economic system as identified by Baumol and Casson. Entrepreneurship is a solution to X-inefficiency, by motivating efforts within firms as argued by Leibenstein. All this has important implications for economic development. Millions of business decisions made by numerous entrepreneurs daily affect an economy a great deal. The pace of economic development ultimately depends on such endeavour of numerous entrepreneurs. It is normally believed that the lagging behind of many developing countries lies in their lack of entrepreneurship. The policy implication is that, in order to have good economic development, governments should create a favourable environment for entrepreneurs to carry out above-mentioned functions in the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Van Phuc, 2014. "Entrepreneurship and economic development: A literature review," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 4(2), pages 3-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:3-17
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.4.2.1006.2014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en/article/view/1006/799
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.econ.en.4.2.1006.2014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Israel M. Kirzner, 1997. "Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 60-85, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Pelkmans & Andrea Renda, "undated". "Does EU Regulation Hinder or Stimulate Innovation?," IRMO Occasional Papers 5, Institute for Development and International Relations, Zagreb.
    2. Yashar Mansoori & Martin Lackéus, 2020. "Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 791-818, March.
    3. Hsieh, Chia-Chun & Ma, Zhiming & Novoselov, Kirill E., 2019. "Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-55.
    4. Ufuk Akcigit & Murat Celik & Daron Acemoglu, 2014. "Young, Restless and Creative: Openness to Disruption and Creative Innovations," 2014 Meeting Papers 377, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    5. Loïc Sauce, 2017. "Market process(es) and (un)knowledge," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 305-321, September.
    6. Meina Cai & Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Murtazashvili & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2020. "Individualism and governance of the commons," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 175-195, July.
    7. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    8. Oasis Kodila-Tedika & Julius Agbor, 2016. "Does Trust Matter for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Wandel, Jürgen, 2009. "Agroholdings and clusters in Kazakhstan's agro-food sector [Agroholdings und Clusters in Kasachstan’s Agrar- und Ernährungssektor]," IAMO Discussion Papers 126, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. Foss Kirsten & Foss Nicolai & Klein Peter G. & Klein Sandra K., 2002. "Heterogeneous Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Organization," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Agnieszka Żur, 2015. "Opportunity Identification and Creation as Factors of Firm Internationalisation," Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, Centre for Strategic and International Entrepreneurship at the Cracow University of Economics., vol. 3(2), pages 25-39.
    12. Francisco Javier Forcadell & Fernando Úbeda, 2022. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation and performance: the mediating role of international entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 875-900, June.
    13. Dorothy Dutta & Mrinmoy K. Sarma, 2021. "Adoption of Digital Innovations: A Special Referenceto Routinised Incremental Innovations," Review of Market Integration, India Development Foundation, vol. 13(2-3), pages 73-97, December.
    14. Richard A. Hunt & Bret Fund, 2012. "Reassessing the Practical and Theoretical Influence of Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition," Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, Pepperdine University, Graziadio School of Business and Management, vol. 16(1), pages 29-56, Spring.
    15. Rigotti, Luca & Ryan, Matthew & Vaithianathan, Rema, 2001. "Entrepreneurial Innovation," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt508109h4, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    16. Lorraine Uhlaner & Franz Kellermanns & Kimberly Eddleston & Frank Hoy, 2012. "The entrepreneuring family: a new paradigm for family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 1-11, January.
    17. Runst, Petrik & Thomä, Jörg, 2023. "Personality and self-employment: A journey into the craft's way of doing business," ifh Working Papers 38/2023, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh), revised 2023.
    18. Emiel L. Eijdenberg & Kathrin Borner, 2017. "The Performance Of Subsistence Entrepreneurs In Tanzania’S Informal Economy," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(01), pages 1-22, March.
    19. repec:zbw:iamodp:91766 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    21. Pierpaolo Andriani & Renata Kaminska, 2020. "Exploring the dynamics of novelty production through exaptation: a historical analysis of coal tar-based innovations," Post-Print halshs-03070325, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:econen:v:4:y:2014:i:2:p:3-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/econ-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.