IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v2y2024i2p52-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the suitability of vector normalization procedure in topsis method: application to wheel loader selection

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Bouhedja

    (University of Badji Mokhtar)

  • Samir Bouhedja

    (University of Sciences and Technology – Houari Boumediene)

  • Aissa Benselhoub

    (Environment, Modeling and Climate Change Division)

Abstract

The object of the research consists of testing the suitability of the vector normalization procedure (NP) in the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method.One of the most problematic steps of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) process is related to the application of NPs by default to transform different measurement units of criteria into a comparable unit. This is because of the absence of a universal agreement that defines which NP is the most suitable for a given MCDM method. In the literature, there are thirty-one available NPs, each one of them has its strengths and weaknesses and, accordingly, can efficiently be applied to an MCDM method and even worst to another. Let’s note that many NPs (e. g., NPs of sum, max-min, vector, and max) have been used by default (i. e., without suitability study) in the TOPSIS method. Consequently, outcomes of multi-criteria evaluation and rankings of alternatives considered in the decision problems could have led to inconsistent solutions, and, therefore, decision-makers could have made irrational or inappropriate decisions. That’s why suitability studies of NPs become indispensable.Moreover, a description of the methodology, proposed in this research, is outlined as follows:1) method of weighting based on an ordinal ranking of criteria and Lagrange multiplier (for determining criteria weights);2) TOPSIS method (for ranking considered alternatives);3) a statistical approach with 3-estimate (for comparing effects generated by the used NPs).In the research, twelve different NPs are compared to each other in the TOPSIS method via a numerical example, which deals with the wheel loader selection problem.The results of the comparison indicate that, amongst the twelve different NPs analyzed in this suitability study, vector NP has the lesser effect on the considered alternatives’ evaluation outcomes, when used with the TOPSIS method.The vector NP-TOPSIS approach can therefore be applied to solve multi-criteria decision problems. Its application further allows the decision-makers and users to better select efficient solutions and, consequently, to make conclusive decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Bouhedja & Samir Bouhedja & Aissa Benselhoub, 2024. "Testing the suitability of vector normalization procedure in topsis method: application to wheel loader selection," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(2(76)), pages 52-62, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:52-62
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2024.301207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/download/301207/294794
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.301207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:2:y:2024:i:2:p:52-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.