IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aif/report/v3y2021i1p1-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Effectiveness of Intermittent mechanical traction among the Patients with Lumbar disc herniation

Author

Listed:
  • A K M Rezwan

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh.)

  • Tofajjol Hossain

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Abir Hasan

    (Intern Physiotherapist, Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Sidratul Muntaha

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Shariful Islam

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

  • Md. Asraful Islam

    (Gonoshasthaya Samaj Vittik Medical Collage, Mirzanagar, Savar, Dhaka-1344, Bangladesh)

Abstract

The low back pain is common problem shown in lumbar disc herniation. It produces pain in the lower back or leg especially in adult person. The disc loses its own structure and herniates outside due to disc compression. The purpose of this study was to find out the Effectiveness of intermittent mechanical traction among the patients with lumbar disc herniation. It was an experimental study design with 30 participants were included with selected Lumbar disc herniation and study was conducted in Gonoshasthaya samaj vittik medical college hospital, OPD of physiotherapy, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Non-randomize sampling technique & semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect the data. Subjects were divided into equal 2 groups. (Group-A. applied intermittent mechanical traction) and (Group-B. Applied Manual traction) The mean age of the respondents was (14 ± 8.485) and (30-49) year’s age group felt more pain and most of the respondents (83%) were male and weight were 66-70 kg. Day labour worker groups were 50% and worked daily average 5-8 hours and more of the respondent 67% carried over weight objects around 30 kg. most of the respondent 67% was no history of trauma and 43% of the respondent felt moderate types of pain and 44% of the respondents feels radiating nature of pain. More of the respondent 40% felt pain least 6 months Most of the respondent 67% felt pain during work and 83% visited doctor and 63% taken self-treatment before doctor visit. The statistical analysis of paired t test with14 degrees of freedom and 5% as level of significant. The pre and post test value value for VAS scale showed in intermitten mechanical traction group “t’’ value were 16.60 and manual traction group “t’’ value were 3.27 and tabulated t value were 2.145. The mean ± SD of pre and posttest value of Group A were 7.73±1.38 & 1.35±0.57 and Group B were 7.87±1.40 & 5.45 ± 2.50. Analysis of data showed that within-group comparison both groups showed significant improvement for all the parameters, whereas between-group comparison revealed higher improvement in Group A compared to the Group B. In this study the treatment of patients with signs of lumbar disc herniation the intermittent mechanical traction of lumbar spine seem more useful for the reduction of pain and improve functional activity.

Suggested Citation

  • A K M Rezwan & Tofajjol Hossain & Md. Abir Hasan & Sidratul Muntaha & Md. Shariful Islam & Md. Asraful Islam, 2021. "Study on Effectiveness of Intermittent mechanical traction among the Patients with Lumbar disc herniation," Journal of Scientific Reports, IJSAB International, vol. 3(1), pages 1-8.
    • Handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:1-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ijsab.com/jsr-volume-3-issue-1/3493
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul T E Cusack, 2020. "On Pain," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(3), pages 24253-24254, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Niederer & Juliane Mueller, 2020. "Sustainability effects of motor control stabilisation exercises on pain and function in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Sana Sadiq & Khadija Anasse & Najib Slimani, 2022. "The impact of mobile phones on high school students: connecting the research dots," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 30(1), pages 252-270, April.
    3. Jitka Vseteckova, 2020. "Psychological Therapy for ICT Literate Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19 - Perceptions on the Acceptability of Online Versus Face to Face Versions of a Mindfulness for Later Life Group," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 31(1), pages 23912-23916, October.
    4. Khalid Ahmed Al-Ansari & Ahmet Faruk Aysan, 2021. "More than ten years of Blockchain creation: How did we use the technology and which direction is the research heading? [Plus de dix ans de création Blockchain : Comment avons-nous utilisé la techno," Working Papers hal-03343048, HAL.
    5. Ling, Gabriel Hoh Teck & Suhud, Nur Amiera binti Md & Leng, Pau Chung & Yeo, Lee Bak & Cheng, Chin Tiong & Ahmad, Mohd Hamdan Haji & Matusin, AK Mohd Rafiq AK, 2021. "Factors Influencing Asia-Pacific Countries’ Success Level in Curbing COVID-19: A Review Using a Social–Ecological System (SES) Framework," SocArXiv b9f2w, Center for Open Science.
    6. Diana Bonfim & Sónia Félix, 2020. "Banks’ complexity and risk: agency problems and diversification benefits," Working Papers w202010, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    7. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2021. "Multinational Enterprises And Economic Nationalism: A Strategic Analysis Of Culture," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 15(1), pages 19-66.
    8. Robert J. R. Elliott & Ingmar Schumacher & Cees Withagen, 2020. "Suggestions for a Covid-19 Post-Pandemic Research Agenda in Environmental Economics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1187-1213, August.
    9. Zi-Fang Zhao & Lei Du & Dong-Xin Wang, 2020. "Effects of dexmedetomidine as a perineural adjuvant for femoral nerve block: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Rafał Krupiński, 2020. "Virtual Reality System and Scientific Visualisation for Smart Designing and Evaluating of Lighting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Klaus S. Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Thomas Leoni, 2021. "Staatliche Hilfsmaßnahmen für Unternehmen in der COVID-19-Krise. Eine begleitende Analyse operativer Aspekte und Unternehmenseinschätzungen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 66624.
    12. Thorbecke, Willem & Chen, Chen & Salike, Nimesh, 2021. "China’s exports in a protectionist world," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    13. Shraddha Palikhe & Jae Young Lee & Bubryur Kim & Mi Yirong & Dong-Eun Lee, 2022. "Ergonomic Risk Assessment of Aluminum Form Workers’ Musculoskeletal Disorder at Construction Workstations Using Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Besedeš, Tibor & Goldbach, Stefan & Nitsch, Volker, 2021. "Cheap talk? Financial sanctions and non-financial firms," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Óscar Chiva-Bartoll & Honorato Morente-Oria & Francisco Tomás González-Fernández & Pedro Jesús Ruiz-Montero, 2020. "Anxiety and Bodily Pain in Older Women Participants in a Physical Education Program. A Multiple Moderated Mediation Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Gigi Foster, 2020. "The behavioural economics of government responses to COVID-19," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 4(S3), pages 11-43, December.
    17. Reza Salajegheh & Edward C Nemergut & Terran M Rice & Roy Joseph & Siny Tsang & Bethany M Sarosiek & C Paige Muthusubramanian & Katelyn M Hipwell & Kate B Horton & Bhiken I Naik, 2020. "Impact of a perioperative oral opioid substitution protocol during the nationwide intravenous opioid shortage: A single center, interrupted time series with segmented regression analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Catharina Gillsjö & Kristina Nässén & Mia Berglund, 2021. "Suffering in silence: a qualitative study of older adults’ experiences of living with long-term musculoskeletal pain at home," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 55-63, March.
    19. Idang Neji Ojong & Alberta David Nsemo & Prudence Aji, 2020. "Routine Medical Checkup Knowledge, Attitude and Practice among Health Care Workers in a Tertiary Health Facility in Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Maryam Rahimzad & Alireza Moghaddam Nia & Hosam Zolfonoon & Jaber Soltani & Ali Danandeh Mehr & Hyun-Han Kwon, 2021. "Performance Comparison of an LSTM-based Deep Learning Model versus Conventional Machine Learning Algorithms for Streamflow Forecasting," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(12), pages 4167-4187, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aif:report:v:3:y:2021:i:1:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Farjana Rahman (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.