IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/342112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Features of Land Use Formation in the Regions of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Moskalenko, Anatolii
  • Ivanov, Dmytro
  • Shyian, Nataliia
  • Khalep, Yurii

Abstract

Purpose. The objective of the study is a comprehensive evaluation of the level of environmental friendliness of land use in the regions of Ukraine, taking into account the structure of cultivated areas. Methodology / approach. The evaluation of the structure of cultivated areas and the level of productivity in the regions of Ukraine was carried out using the method of complex ranking score. This allowed consolidating data on different crops to a single indicator and evaluating the situation in the regions. The regression method was used to evaluate the dependence of the ranking score on the structure of the cultivated areas and the level of productivity in the regions. A graphical method was also used to display the level of relationship between the studied indicators. Results. It was established that in 2022, the structure of cultivated areas did not significantly differ from the situation in 2020 and 2021. The use of a ranking score of changes in the structure of cultivated areas made it possible to establish that in terms of crop groups, the situation was better in 2022 in the regions of Zakarpattia, Volyn and Rivne. The most violations in the structure of cultivated areas were noted in the regions of Sumy, Mykolaiv and Kirovohrad. It turned out to be the best in the regions of Zakarpattia, Lviv and Volyn in terms of individual cultures. The most problematic situation with respect to the structure of cultivated areas was in the regions of Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Luhansk. Originality / scientific novelty. The use of methods of the complex ranking score based on the criterion of environmental friendliness of production (structure of cultivated areas) and the level of its efficiency (crop productivity) made it possible to establish that there is a direct level of connection between these indicators. This fact is proof that the optimal structure of land use has a positive effect on the level of crop productivity. Practical value / implications. The obtained results of the study give grounds for raising the question of creating an economic mechanism aimed at stimulating agricultural enterprises to comply with optimal land use standards in terms of compliance with the structure of cultivated areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Moskalenko, Anatolii & Ivanov, Dmytro & Shyian, Nataliia & Khalep, Yurii, 2023. "Environmental Features of Land Use Formation in the Regions of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:342112
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342112/files/Environmental%20features%20of%20land%20use%20formation%20in%20the%20regions%20of%20Ukraine.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rudd, Murray A., 2000. "Live long and prosper: collective action, social capital and social vision," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 131-144, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marbuah, George & Gren, Ing-Marie, 2015. "Carbon emission and social capital in Sweden," Working Paper Series 2015:5, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department Economics.
    2. Fiorillo, Damiano, 2005. "Capitale Sociale Civile: una nota sui concetti e sulla evidenza empirica macro [Civil Social Capital: a note on the concepts and on the macro empirical evidence]," MPRA Paper 3822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Saenz, Cesar, 2021. "Community partnership and ownership as key factors of community strategies. A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Barnaud, Cécile & Bousquet, François & Trebuil, Guy, 2008. "Multi-agent simulations to explore rules for rural credit in a highland farming community of Northern Thailand," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(4), pages 615-627, July.
    5. Uetake, Tetsuya, 2012. "Providing Agri-environmental Public Goods through Collective Action: Lessons from New Zealand Case Studies," 2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand 136071, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Liang, Qiao & Huang, Zuhui & Lu, Haiyang & Wang, Xinxin, 2015. "Social Capital, Member Participation, and Cooperative Performance: Evidence from China’s Zhejiang," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-30, February.
    7. Philip Walsh, 2011. "Creating a “values” chain for sustainable development in developing nations: where Maslow meets Porter," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 789-805, August.
    8. Luke Oyesola Olarinde & Adebayo Busura Abass & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Adebusola Adenike Adepoju & Matthew Olufemi Adio & Emmanuel Gbenga Fanifosi & Awoyale Wasiu, 2020. "The Influence of Social Networking on Food Security Status of Cassava Farming Households in Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-35, July.
    9. Ryan Plummer & John FitzGibbon, 2006. "People matter: The importance of social capital in the co‐management of natural resources," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 30(1), pages 51-62, February.
    10. Rudd, Murray A., 2004. "An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 109-124, January.
    11. Eric Kemp-Benedict, 2013. "Inequality and Trust: Testing a Mediating Relationship for Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Mercer-Mapstone, Lucy & Rifkin, Will & Louis, Winnifred & Moffat, Kieren, 2017. "Meaningful dialogue outcomes contribute to laying a foundation for social licence to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 347-355.
    13. Akinola Ezekiel Morakinyo & Mabutho Sibanda, 2016. "The Determinants of Non-Performing Loans in the MINT Economies," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 8(5), pages 39-55.
    14. Moskalenko, Anatolii & Ivanov, Dmytro & Shyian, Nataliia & Khalep, Yurii, 2023. "Environmental features of land use formation in the regions of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    15. Jaco Vermaak, 2009. "Reassessing the concept of 'social capital': considering resources for satisfying the needs of rural communities," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 399-412.
    16. Pascal C. Sanginga & Colletah A. Chitsike & Jemimah Njuki & Susan Kaaria & Rogers Kanzikwera, 2007. "Enhanced learning from multi‐stakeholder partnerships: Lessons from the Enabling Rural Innovation in Africa programme," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(4), pages 273-285, November.
    17. Hejnowicz, Adam P. & Raffaelli, David G. & Rudd, Murray A. & White, Piran C.L., 2014. "Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 83-97.
    18. Krishna Paudel & Mark Schafer, 2009. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New Framework: The Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(2), pages 265-278, February.
    19. Muhammad Javed SHEIKH & Ma'rof REDZUAN & Asnarulkhadi Abu SAMAH & Nobaya AHMAD, 2015. "Identifying sources of social capital among the farmers of the rural Sindh province of Pakistan," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 189-195.
    20. Ortiz-Riomalo, Juan Felipe & Engel, Stefanie & Koessler, Ann-Kathrin, 2024. "Envisioning collective action for sustainable resource management. An economic experiment," EconStor Preprints 300582, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:342112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.