IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v5y2016p228-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurship Development in South East Region of Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru Costin Cirstea

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Oana Georgiana Stanila

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Mihai Sebe

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

In the current conditions of high entrepreneurial phenomenon at international level, it is important to make an analysis for obtaining an accurate current development stage of Romanian entrepreneurship at local and regional level, which is also a prerequisite for development and implementation of strategic measures of entrepreneurship development in Romania. Through statistical analysis and questionnaire survey, this study provides a clear radiography of entrepreneurship development status and evolution of SMEs in the South East region. The study results can be used to propose further measures to support local and regional entrepreneurship and the research methodology can be applied later to others regions and even at national level.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru Costin Cirstea & Oana Georgiana Stanila & Mihai Sebe, 2016. "Entrepreneurship Development in South East Region of Romania," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 5, pages 228-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:5:y:2016:p:228-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2016edition/file2016(26).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randolph Luca Bruno & Maria Bytchkova & Saul Estrin, 2013. "Institutional Determinants of New Firm Entry in Russia: A Cross-Regional Analysis," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(5), pages 1740-1749, December.
    2. Ovidiu NICOLESCU & Ciprian NICOLESCU, 2010. "Coordinates of Policy Concerning SMEs Development in Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(1), pages 5-20, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çağatay Bircan & Ralph De Haas, 2020. "The Limits of Lending? Banks and Technology Adoption across Russia," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(2), pages 536-609.
    2. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zhang, Min, 2020. "The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Codruța Dura & Imola Drigă, 2015. "Overview on Romania’s small bussines act profile in 2015," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 15(2), pages 37-44.
    4. Joanna Tyrowicz & Joanna Nestorowicz, 2010. "Cynicism Starts Young: Age and Entrepreneurship over Transition," Working Papers 2010-02, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    5. Gaaitzen J. Vries, 2014. "Productivity in a Distorted Market: The Case of Brazil's Retail Sector," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(3), pages 499-524, September.
    6. Vladimir Sokolov & Laura Solanko, 2017. "Political Influence, Firm Performance and Survival," HSE Working papers WP BRP 60/FE/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Eugenia Bessonova & Gonchar Ksenia, 2017. "Structural Decisions of Multinationals in Regions with Weak Courts," HSE Working papers WP BRP 161/EC/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    8. Bessonova, Evguenia & Gonchar, Ksenia, 2019. "How the innovation-competition link is shaped by technology distance in a high-barrier catch-up economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 86, pages 15-32.
    9. Bessonova, Eugenia, 2010. "Efficiency of Manufacturing in Russia: Effect of Domestic Competition and FDI," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 17(1), pages 106-127.
    10. Victoria Golikova & Boris Kuznetsov, 2017. "Suboptimal Size: Factors Preventing the Growth of Russian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 83-93.
    11. Hao Wang & Yuemei Ji & Qi Luo, 2020. "The Employment Effect of Inward FDI in China: What Do We Learn from the History?," CESifo Working Paper Series 8392, CESifo.
    12. Claudia Isac, 2016. "Facilities Granted to Students for Business Development," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 16(2), pages 37-44.
    13. Estrin, Saul & Meyer, Klaus E. & Nielsen, Bo B. & Nielsen, Sabina, 2016. "Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 294-307.
    14. Davydova, Yulia & Sokolov, Vladimir, 2014. "The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a debt subsidization program targeted at strategic firms," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 247-265.
    15. Cui, Chuantao & Li, Leona Shao-Zhi, 2023. "Trade policy uncertainty and new firm entry: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    16. Kaku Attah Damoah & Giorgia Giovannetti & Marco Sanfilippo, 2021. "Markup Dispersion and Firm Entry: Evidence from Ethiopia," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 83(2), pages 299-327, April.
    17. Xibao Li, 2017. "Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of entrepreneurship in Chinese manufacturing industries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(5), pages 1077-1099, October.
    18. Sokolov, Vladimir & Solanko, Laura, 2016. "Political influence, firm performance and survival," BOFIT Discussion Papers 20/2016, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    19. Sokolov, Vladimir & Solanko, Laura, 2016. "Political influence, firm performance and survival," BOFIT Discussion Papers 20/2016, Bank of Finland, Institute for Economies in Transition.
    20. Noman Shaheer & Jingtao Yi & Sali Li & Liang Chen, 2019. "State-Owned Enterprises as Bribe Payers: The Role of Institutional Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 221-238, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:5:y:2016:p:228-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.