IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v39y2015i17p815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quality of the educational process at university department level – a community of practice view

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Nicolae

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The literature and evidence of the theory and practice of quality assessment in higher education has been growing fast. Within the larger field of quality assessment, the terms good practices and communities of practice have been largely used by administrators, managers and practitioners with various intentions and conotations. The present article explores the use of the concepts in the Romanian higher education with the view to document the process of adopting or developing an internal assessment procedure in the languages department of a non-philological university in Romania. The need for such an endeavour and the associated challenges are explained through the external pressures to increase the visibility of the department both at institutional and general public levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Nicolae, 2015. "The quality of the educational process at university department level – a community of practice view," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(39), pages 815-815, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:39:y:2015:i:17:p:815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2427.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roxana Sârbu & Anca Gabriela Ilie & Antonia Cristiana Enache & Dan Dumitriu, 2009. "The Quality of Educational Services in Higher Education – Assurance, Management or Excellence?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 383-392, June.
    2. Anca Gabriela Ilie & Mihaela Maftei & Oana Antonia Colibasanu, 2011. "Sustainable Success in Higher Education by Sharing the Best Practices as a Result of Benchmarking Process," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(Special N), pages 688-697, November.
    3. Roxana Sîrbu & Antonia Cristiana Scurtulescu & Crina Raluca Bucur, 2007. "Quality in higher education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(22), pages 41-46, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolae Mariana & Nicolae Elena E., 2018. "Leadership in Higher Education – coping with AI and the turbulence of our times," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 683-694, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anca Gabriela Ilie & Mihaela Maftei & Oana Antonia Colibasanu, 2011. "Sustainable Success in Higher Education by Sharing the Best Practices as a Result of Benchmarking Process," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(Special N), pages 688-697, November.
    2. Ioan Plăiaş & Ciprian-Marcel Pop & Raluca Băbuţ & Dan Cristian Dabija, 2011. "Employers’ Perception Of Competences Acquired Through Academic Marketing Training In Knowledge Based Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 448-463, June.
    3. Alexandra-Maria Drule & Irimie Emil Popa & Razvan Nistor & Alexandru Chis, 2014. "Quality of the Teaching Process and its Factors of Influence from the Perspective of Future Business Specialists," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 827-827, August.
    4. Rahmat Nurcahyo & Fany Apriliani & Erlinda Muslim & Alan Dwi Wibowo, 2019. "The Analysis of the Implementation of 5-S Principles Integrated With ISO 9001 Requirements at Higher Education Level," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, August.
    5. Sorin-George Toma, 2011. "Exploratory Research On Students` Opinions Regarding The Features Of The Educational Process In A Knowledge-Based Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 565-579, June.
    6. Marta-Christina Suciu & Irina-Virginia Drăgulănescu & Alexandru Ghiţiu-Brătescu & Luciana Picioruş & Cosmin Imbrişcă, 2011. "Universities` Role in Knowledge-Based Economy and Society. Implications for Romanian Economics Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(30), pages 420-436, June.
    7. Codruţa Dura & Claudia Isac, 2014. "The diagnosis of the quality of educational services within the University of Petroşani," Annals of the University of Petrosani, Economics, University of Petrosani, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 71-90.
    8. Roxana Sarbu & Adriana Zamfir, 2011. "The Necessity of Implementing a Quality Management System in the Romanian Medical Units. An Approach from the Patients Point of View," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(Special N), pages 679-687, November.
    9. Razvan DINA, 2015. "How influence the MOOCs platforms the quality of knowledge," Oeconomics of Knowledge, Saphira Publishing House, vol. 7(2), pages 2-13, April.
    10. Ecaterina Milica DOBROTA & Roxana SARBU & Silvius STANCIU, 2022. "The SMEs Accessibility to Public Procurement in Romania. The Grounds for Bids Rejection," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 68-75.
    11. Mihai-Florin Bacila & Marcel Ciprian Pop & Mircea Andrei Scridon & Raluca Ciornea, 2014. "Development of an Instrument for Measuring Student Satisfaction in Business Educational Institutions," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 841-841, August.
    12. Speranţa Pirciog & Aniela Matei & Bertha Sănduleasa & Mihaela Ghenţa, 2010. "Consumption of Public Childcare and Educational Services: an End-User Perspective," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(28), pages 546-557, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quality assessment; good practices; communities of practice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • D73 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Bureaucracy; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations; Corruption

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:39:y:2015:i:17:p:815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.