RePEc Click here to visit St. Louis Fed Research IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | Data (FRED) | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Plagiarism | Help! ]

Top 25% Think Tanks, as of September 2011

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. These rankings take only into account institutions registered in EDIRC and authors registered with the RePEc Author Service and the institutions they claimed to be affiliated with. For Think Tanks, these are 141 institutions. Institutions need satisfy the following criteria to be included: Institutions listed as think tank on EDIRC.
All institutions in this category.

Top 25% Think Tanks

Please note that rankings can depend on the number of registered authors in the respective institutions. Register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreInstitution
11.08National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA)
22.88Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
33.84Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
44.11Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany
54.16Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom
65.34ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V., München, Germany
76.13DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin, Germany
86.4Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
97.32Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden
108.62Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
1111.23Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini, Italy
1212.26Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, Ireland
1314.5Centre d'études prospectives et d'informations internationales (CEPII), Paris, France
1414.67Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI), Tokyo, Japan
1514.76American Enterprise Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
1617.2Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow, Russia
1717.61Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), San Francisco, California (USA)
1817.67Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel, Belgium
1917.93Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen, Germany
2018.29W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan (USA)
2120.89C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto, Canada
2222.64Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg, Germany
2324.36Urban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
2424.4EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands
2524.46Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), México, Mexico
2627.17Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), Washington, District of Columbia (USA)
2727.37Motu: Economic & Public Policy Research, Wellington, New Zealand
2827.4Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies (JIMS), Jerusalem, Israel
2928.24Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson, New York (USA)
3029.3Elinkeinoelämän Tutkimuslaitos (ETLA), Helsinki, Finland
3129.56Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus (VATT), Government of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
3230.06Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle (IWH), Halle, Germany
3331.33Manhattan Institute, New York, New York (USA)
3434.58Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE), Lima, Peru
3535.61The Conference Board, New York City, New York (USA)

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.