| Rank | Score | Institution | 1 | 1.12 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) | 2 | 1.86 | Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) | 3 | 3.51 | Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City, New York (USA) | 4 | 4.37 | European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main, Germany | 5 | 4.99 | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Minnesota (USA) | 6 | 5.57 | Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri (USA) | 7 | 5.62 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco, California (USA) | 8 | 7.49 | Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (USA) | 9 | 9.71 | Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (USA) | 10 | 11.77 | Banca d'Italia, Roma, Italy | 11 | 12.16 | Sveriges Riksbank, Stockholm, Sweden | 12 | 12.74 | Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia (USA) | 13 | 13.88 | Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia (USA) | 14 | 13.92 | Bank of Canada, Ottawa, Canada | 15 | 15.77 | Bank of England, London, United Kingdom | 16 | 16.04 | Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio (USA) | 17 | 16.06 | Banco de España, Madrid, Spain | 18 | 16.89 | Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Boston, Massachusetts (USA) | 19 | 17.54 | Banque de France, Paris, France | 20 | 20.02 | de Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, Netherlands | 21 | 20.04 | Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Dallas, Texas (USA) | 22 | 20.95 | Schweizerische Nationalbank (SNB), Bern/Zürich, Switzerland | 23 | 22.42 | Banco de la Republica de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia | 24 | 22.54 | Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel, Switzerland |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits: