RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of April 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 104 authors affiliated with 368 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 10% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.25Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
21.97Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.03Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.19Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
45.26Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(5)5.55Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(5)7.21Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
59.21Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(6)9.43School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
69.43Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
711.4Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
812.01Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
912.27Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
1013.05Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1113.18Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(12)16.45Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
1216.46Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(13)19.35Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1319.35College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1420.03Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1521.25Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1622.36Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1722.59Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(18)24.16Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1824.62Department of Economics, University of California-Riverside, Riverside
(19)25.86Environmental Economics Unit, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
(19)26.11Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1932.38Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(20)32.62Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2033.25Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
2138.22Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
(22)39.11Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2239.11Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2339.55Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
2440.94Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm
2541.76Banco Central de Chile, Santiago
2642.02Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
2742.16Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
2842.21Economics Department, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
2944.11Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford
3044.41Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3145.13Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
3245.32Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
3345.63Economics and Environmental Sciences, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
(34)46.62Economic Analysis & Policy Group (EAP), Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3446.77Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(35)49.37Departement Algemene Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
3549.65Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
(36)49.95The European Institute of Japanese Studies, Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, Stockholm
3650.79Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington

Top 10% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.4Jeffrey Alexander Frankel
2.1.52Peter Nijkamp
3.3.37William A. Brock
4.4.31Elinor Ostrom
5.5.58Anastasios Xepapadeas
6.6.46Robert Norman Stavins
7.6.95Fredrik Carlsson
8.7.21Ramon Lopez
9.8.26Gary D. Libecap
10.11.3Thomas Sterner

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.