RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 10% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Neuroeconomics, as of April 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Neuroeconomics, these are 47 authors affiliated with 272 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 10% institutions in the field of Neuroeconomics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-NEU (Neuroeconomics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.16Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
23.43Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (CeGE), Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
33.44Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
44.4Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
55.05Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
65.91Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
76.11Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka University, Osaka
88.72Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
98.82CRC "Armut, Ungleichheit und Wachstum in Entwicklungsländern", Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
109.87Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1111.9Volkswirtschaftliches Seminar, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
1211.91Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1313.35College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando
1414.57CESifo, München
1514.61Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
(16)18.63Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
1618.63Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
(17)18.94Institute for Public Economics, Department of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton
1718.94Department of Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton
1819.71Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
1921.19Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2022.53Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2122.59London School of Economics (LSE), London
(21)22.59Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), London
2223.6Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
2326.64Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex, Colchester
(23)26.64European Centre for Analysis in the Social Sciences (ECASS), Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), University of Essex, Colchester
2426.7World Bank Group, Washington
2529.56College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie
(25)29.56Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie
2631.36ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve/Bruxelles
(27)33.36European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
2733.98Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

Top 10% authors in the field of Neuroeconomics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.32Shinsuke Ikeda
2.3.62Melville McMillan
3.3.76Ruut Veenhoven
4.4.04Fumio Ohtake

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.