RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Forecasting, as of February 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Forecasting, these are 413 authors affiliated with 746 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Forecasting

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FOR (Forecasting).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.47Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
34.98Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
45.62Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
56.53European Central Bank, Frankfurt am Main
(6)8.34Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
68.38Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
78.43Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
88.65Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
99.37Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
109.42Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(11)10.72Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis
1110.72Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, St. Louis
(12)10.85Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
1212.53Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
1316.24Institute for International Economic Studies (IIES), Stockholms Universitet, Stockholm
1416.65Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1518.52International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
1619.75Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
1720.17School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney
1820.45Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1921.8Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2022.05Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
2122.2Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2223.7Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(23)24.2Research and Statistics Group, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
2324.2Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City
2424.31Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
(25)27.73Volatility Institute, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
2527.75London Business School (LBS), London
2628.99Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
2729.87Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City
(27)29.87Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Kansas City
(28)30.63Department of Economics, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City
2830.63Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City
2930.64Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
3031.38Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
3131.95Rady School of Management, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
(32)32.13Department of Economics, London Business School (LBS), London
3233.02Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
3333.52Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
3433.71Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
(35)34.8Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
3540.2Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
3640.49Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
3741.43Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Top 5% authors in the field of Forecasting

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.14M Hashem Pesaran
2.2.96Peter Nijkamp
3.3.73Michael McAleer
4.3.92Lars E. O. Svensson
5.5.56John Geweke
6.7.44Todd Clark
7.7.95Charles H. Whiteman
8.8.23Lucrezia Reichlin
9.8.74Allan Timmermann
10.9.35Francis X. Diebold
11.11.03Michael McCracken
12.11.31Michael Peter Clements
13.11.4J. Scott Armstrong
14.12.43Gregor W. Smith
15.13.73Massimiliano Marcellino
16.15.98Tom McCurdy
17.16.13Herman O. Stekler
18.17.4Roberto S. Mariano
19.20.16Robert William Faff
20.22.25Kajal Lahiri

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.