| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.1 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
2 | 2.24 | Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
3 | 3.67 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington |
4 | 5.63 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
5 | 6.05 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
6 | 6.25 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
(7) | 8.07 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
7 | 8.91 | Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor |
(8) | 9.22 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
(8) | 11.19 | Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
8 | 11.8 | Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles |
9 | 14.78 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
10 | 15.83 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
11 | 15.97 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
12 | 16.07 | Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla |
13 | 17.43 | Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
14 | 18.67 | International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
(15) | 18.73 | Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam |
15 | 19.52 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
16 | 20.49 | Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
17 | 22.03 | World Bank Group, Washington |
(18) | 22.92 | Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
18 | 22.92 | Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
19 | 22.96 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
20 | 23.02 | Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
21 | 23.16 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
22 | 23.56 | DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin |
23 | 24.46 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
24 | 27.56 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston |
25 | 29.04 | Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
26 | 29.57 | Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas |
27 | 30.02 | Economics Department, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee |
28 | 31.16 | University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(28) | 31.16 | Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM), University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(29) | 31.3 | Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(29) | 32.44 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
29 | 32.44 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
30 | 33.09 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
31 | 34.72 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
32 | 36.68 | Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames |
33 | 36.7 | AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington |
34 | 40.39 | Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
35 | 42.37 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
36 | 43.7 | Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston |
37 | 44.36 | Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville |
38 | 45.08 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
39 | 46.48 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
40 | 48.4 | Department of Management, Technology and Economics (D-MTEC), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich |
(41) | 48.46 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
(41) | 49.11 | Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
41 | 49.57 | Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford |
42 | 50.57 | Centre de Recerca en Economia Internacional (CREI), Barcelona |
43 | 51.71 | Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary |
44 | 52.02 | Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry |
45 | 52.98 | Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano |
46 | 55.11 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
47 | 55.12 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
48 | 56.94 | Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam |
49 | 57.59 | London School of Economics (LSE), London |
50 | 60.15 | Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine |
51 | 60.32 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
52 | 60.63 | Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville |
53 | 61.34 | Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham |
54 | 64.42 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
55 | 64.55 | College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
56 | 66.34 | Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo |
(57) | 67.92 | Research School of Economics, College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
57 | 68.48 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
