| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.1 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, Massachusetts (USA) |
2 | 2.57 | Brookings Institution, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
3 | 3.38 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London, United Kingdom |
4 | 4.17 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn, Germany |
5 | 5.55 | Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm, Sweden |
6 | 5.56 | DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin, Germany |
7 | 5.72 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
8 | 5.96 | ifo Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung e.V., München, Germany |
9 | 8.01 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland |
10 | 10.81 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin, Ireland |
11 | 11.09 | American Enterprise Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
12 | 11.45 | Rimini Center for Economic Analysis (RCEA), Rimini, Italy |
13 | 12.99 | Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow, Russia |
14 | 14 | Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics (IIE), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
15 | 14.24 | Centre d'études prospectives et d'informations internationales (CEPII), Paris, France |
16 | 15.89 | Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC), San Francisco, California (USA) |
17 | 16.32 | W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Michigan (USA) |
18 | 16.65 | Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (RWI), Essen, Germany |
19 | 18.62 | Bruegel, Bruxelles/Brussel, Belgium |
20 | 20.04 | Motu: Economic & Public Policy Research, Wellington, New Zealand |
21 | 22.71 | EIM Business & Policy Research, Zoetermeer, Netherlands |
22 | 23.04 | Urban Institute, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
23 | 24.49 | Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg, Germany |
24 | 24.52 | C. D. Howe Institute, Toronto, Canada |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
