RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Operations Research, as of January 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Operations Research, these are 97 authors affiliated with 363 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Operations Research

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-ORE (Operations Research).
RankScoreInstitution
11Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.88Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
33Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
(4)3.37Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
(4)4.72Volatility Institute, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
45.12School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology, Sydney
58.91Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City
(5)8.91Department of Economics, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City
611.29Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
711.31Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
813.03Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
913.2Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
1013.63ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(11)14.29Finance Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
(11)15.07Finance Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1115.07Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1215.31Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Sydney
1316.06Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(14)16.84Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1417.74Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
1521.74Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1622.27UFR Mathématiques Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Université Charles-de-Gaulle (Lille 3), Lille
1722.36Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(18)23.92School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1826.28Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
(18)26.28Department of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston

Top 5% authors in the field of Operations Research

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.35Peter C. B. Phillips
2.1.92John Geweke
3.3.28John Geweke
4.4.56Allan W. Gregory

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.