RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Insurance Economics, as of January 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Insurance Economics, these are 356 authors affiliated with 823 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Insurance Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-IAS (Insurance Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
22.72Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
33.89Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
44.81RAND, Santa Monica
55.07Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
66.4World Bank Group, Washington
76.42Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
88.17Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
99.22Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
1010.4Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(11)11.59Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1113.31Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1214.04Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)14.04Finance Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
1314.25Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
1415.01Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1517.01Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1617.79Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
1721.06National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(18)21.07Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1821.07Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
(19)22.45Econometrics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1923.39Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
(20)24.27Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2024.35Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2125.07International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2225.45Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
2326.23Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
2426.98Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
2527.81Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
2628.44Département d'Économie, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau
2731.19Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
2832.83Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
2933.41Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
3036.5London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3136.65Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago
3238.49HEC Montréal (École des Hautes Études Commerciales), Montréal
3338.53Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
(34)39.86Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington
3439.86Brookings Institution, Washington
3540.18CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
3640.35Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
(37)41.01Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
3741.23Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
(38)41.45Department of Economics, Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
3841.45Carol Martin Gatton College of Business and Economics, University of Kentucky, Lexington
3942.21Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
4045.01Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
4146.86Economics Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown

Top 5% authors in the field of Insurance Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.29Gary S. Becker
2.3.54B. Douglas Bernheim
3.3.56Jonathan Gruber
4.3.64Paul Michael Romer
5.6James Pesando
6.6.42Kenneth A. Froot
7.7.05Myron S. Scholes
8.8.8Daniel L. McFadden
9.10.05David M. Cutler
10.10.36Assar Lindbeck
11.10.69Adam Wagstaff
12.12.32Robert Shimer
13.12.61Clifford M. Winston
14.13.4Donald O. Parsons
15.15.66Aaron Yelowitz
16.16.28Michael C. Lovell
17.16.61Pravin K Trivedi

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.