Field Rankings at IDEAS: Financial Development & Growth

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Financial Development & Growth, as of January 2010

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Financial Development & Growth, these are 171 authors affiliated with 681 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Financial Development & Growth

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-FDG (Financial Development & Growth).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.45	Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2	3.61	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(2)	3.61	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3	3.79	Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(4)	4.6	Stanford Center for International Development (SCID), Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
4	4.6	Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
5	4.98	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
6	5.02	International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
7	6.13	Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
8	8.71	World Bank Group, Washington
9	9.44	Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(10)	11.41	Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
10	12.9	Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
11	13.13	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
12	13.83	Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
13	17.37	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
14	19	Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research (CeGE), Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
15	19.53	Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca
(16)	20.04	Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
16	21.7	Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
17	24.97	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
18	27.29	Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
19	29.43	Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington
20	30.84	CESifo, München
21	32.07	Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
22	32.32	Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
23	32.69	Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
24	34.59	Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
(25)	34.73	Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
(25)	35.15	Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton
25	35.37	Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
26	35.49	CRC "Armut, Ungleichheit und Wachstum in Entwicklungsländern", Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen
27	37.43	Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(27)	37.43	Global Economics & Management Group, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
28	38.13	National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
29	40.9	Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
30	41.74	Brookings Institution, Washington
31	42.22	Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
32	42.28	Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
33	44.24	Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
(34)	44.65	Global Economy and Development Program, Brookings Institution, Washington
34	44.85	Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City

Top 5% authors in the field of Financial Development & Growth

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1.1	John B. Taylor
2.	2.08	Kenneth J. Arrow
3.	3.55	Eswar Prasad
4.	4.85	Ayhan Kose
5.	6.61	Marco E. Terrones
6.	6.78	Ramon Lopez
7.	10.6	Jakob B. Madsen
8.	11.33	Juan Fernández de Guevara

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE), Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.