| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.39 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
2 | 2.07 | World Bank Group, Washington |
3 | 3.35 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
(4) | 3.61 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
4 | 6.5 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
5 | 6.94 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
6 | 7.04 | Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames |
(7) | 7.73 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
7 | 8.33 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
(8) | 10.66 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
8 | 11.3 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
9 | 12.72 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
10 | 14.19 | Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
11 | 14.38 | Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing |
12 | 15.69 | Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames |
13 | 18.52 | Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette |
14 | 19.03 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
15 | 19.63 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
16 | 24.81 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
17 | 25.38 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(18) | 26.75 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
18 | 26.75 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
19 | 27.32 | Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton |
(19) | 27.32 | Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton |
(20) | 28.36 | Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
20 | 28.36 | College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
21 | 29.56 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
(22) | 32.07 | Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
22 | 32.32 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
(23) | 32.47 | Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
23 | 32.54 | Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(23) | 32.54 | Finance Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
24 | 33.29 | Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison |
25 | 34.03 | Économie Publique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Paris-Grignon |
26 | 34.94 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
27 | 36.26 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
28 | 36.73 | Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot |
29 | 37.91 | Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide |
30 | 38.22 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
31 | 39.43 | Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City |
(31) | 39.43 | Economics Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City |
32 | 39.48 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington |
33 | 39.63 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
34 | 39.71 | Department of Applied Economics, College of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-St. Paul, St. Paul |
35 | 39.73 | Economic Research Service, Department of Agriculture, Government of the United States, Washington |
(36) | 40.02 | Center for Global Trade Analysis (GTAP), Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette |
36 | 41.98 | National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo |
37 | 44.44 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
38 | 45.06 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
39 | 46.5 | Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan |
(40) | 46.75 | Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
40 | 46.75 | College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
41 | 49.17 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
42 | 50.34 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
43 | 50.63 | Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign |
44 | 51.57 | School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
45 | 51.6 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
46 | 54.25 | Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
47 | 56.34 | Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London |
(48) | 56.6 | Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
48 | 58.14 | Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfswetenschappen, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven |
(49) | 61.07 | Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
49 | 64.8 | Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury |
50 | 65.64 | Fødevareøkonomisk Institut, Københavns Universitet, København |
51 | 69.02 | Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
