RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory, as of November 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Utility Models & Prospect Theory, these are 392 authors affiliated with 899 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-UPT (Utility Models & Prospect Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.05Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
21.89Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)2.95Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
36.02Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
46.2Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
58.32Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
68.88London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
79.25Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
89.54Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
911.03Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1011.2Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
1111.72School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
(12)13.17Econometrisch Instituut, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam
1215.99Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1317.08Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
(14)18.07School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1418.41Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
1518.83Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(16)20.36Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1621.57Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1722.51Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1823.29Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
1924.03Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2024.43Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
2124.68Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2225.5Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris
(23)26.22Finance Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
2327.16Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2428.63Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
2529.95Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
(26)30.93Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
2631.02School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
2731.13Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
2832School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
2932.33Department of Economics, Indiana University, Bloomington
3032.81Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby
3135.33Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
3235.78Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(33)36.3Department of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
3336.49Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3438.32Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3538.97Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
3641.69Centre de Recerca en Economia Internacional (CREI), Barcelona
(37)43.21Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(37)44.51Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3744.76International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
3845.03Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3945.25Department of Economics, York University, Toronto
4046.12Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
4146.71Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham
4246.82Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
4347.39Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee
4450.55ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles

Top 5% authors in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.09Bruno S. Frey
2.2.9Klaus F. Zimmermann
3.3.86Peter P. Wakker
4.3.88John Moore
5.5.73Richard S.J. Tol
6.8.31Benno Torgler
7.8.79Robert Sugden
8.8.83Peter E. Rossi
9.9.49Arthur John Robson
10.10.59David Schmeidler
11.11.71Andrew J. Oswald
12.12.41Chris D Orme
13.13.2Uzi Segal
14.13.69Sujoy Mukerji
15.13.7Massimo Marinacci
16.14.16Mark Huggett
17.15.01Richard E. Just
18.17.3Itzhak Gilboa
19.17.48Edi Karni

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.