RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of November 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 87 authors affiliated with 348 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.23Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
22.03Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.1Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
33.73Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(4)4.94Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(4)5.83Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
47.51Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(5)8.84School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
58.84Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
610.46Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
711.49Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
812.89Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
913.43Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1015.95Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
1116Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)16.87Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1216.87College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
(13)18.48Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
(13)19.52Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1320.68Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
1421Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1521.58Department of Economics, University of California-Riverside, Riverside
1621.63Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
1721.67Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse

Top 5% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.38Peter Nijkamp
2.1.46Jeffrey Alexander Frankel
3.4.59Ramon Lopez
4.5.23Robert Norman Stavins

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.