RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of November 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 148 authors affiliated with 494 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.1Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
22.32Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
33.06Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(4)4.4Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
45.83World Bank Group, Washington
56.13Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(6)7.42Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
67.42Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
79.48Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(7)9.48Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
89.66Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(9)13.25Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
916.12Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
1016.72Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1118.54Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1218.62Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1319.12Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
1419.39Department of Economics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan
1519.41Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1619.63Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1721.58Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
1822Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(18)22Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1923.28Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
2025.28Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2130.1Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
2230.42Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
2331.24Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
(24)32.86Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2432.93Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.09Erik Brynjolfsson
2.2.22John Vickers
3.3.17Philip E. Graves
4.4.63Eduardo M.R.A. Engel
5.4.63Abdullah Yavas
6.4.91David F. Burgess
7.6.17Antonio Estache

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.