| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.08 | Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago |
2 | 2.05 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
3 | 3.76 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
(4) | 4.8 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
4 | 5.75 | Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton |
5 | 6.01 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(6) | 6.89 | Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton |
6 | 10.2 | Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
7 | 10.28 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
8 | 11.45 | World Bank Group, Washington |
9 | 11.77 | RAND, Santa Monica |
10 | 12.48 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
11 | 12.62 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(12) | 13.26 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
12 | 14.94 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(13) | 15.04 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
13 | 16.45 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
14 | 17.62 | Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim |
15 | 21.12 | Department of Economics, Graduate School, City University of New York, New York City |
16 | 21.77 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
17 | 22.74 | Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
18 | 22.94 | Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor |
(19) | 23.83 | Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
19 | 23.83 | Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
20 | 24.66 | Department of Policy Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca |
21 | 25.18 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
22 | 25.51 | Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville |
23 | 27.4 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
24 | 27.63 | Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York |
(25) | 28.37 | Harvard Institute for International Development (HIID), Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
25 | 29.11 | Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover |
26 | 30.09 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
27 | 31.16 | Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry |
28 | 31.52 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
29 | 32.48 | Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago |
30 | 33.44 | Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge |
31 | 33.62 | Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
32 | 34.47 | Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham |
33 | 35.05 | Department of Economics, McMaster University, Hamilton |
34 | 35.51 | Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago |
(35) | 40.14 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
35 | 40.14 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
36 | 42.14 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
37 | 42.23 | Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
38 | 43.02 | Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston |
39 | 44.61 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
40 | 46.39 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
(41) | 46.67 | Center for Economic Policy Studies, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
(41) | 47.33 | Economics Department, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro |
41 | 47.33 | Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro |
(42) | 47.87 | Econometrics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
42 | 49.49 | Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto |
43 | 49.5 | Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
44 | 50.89 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
45 | 50.97 | Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne, Melbourne |
46 | 51.22 | Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
47 | 51.6 | London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
(48) | 54.3 | Center for Resources and the Environment, Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham |
48 | 54.69 | Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London |
(49) | 61.02 | Economic Studies, Brookings Institution, Washington |
49 | 61.02 | Brookings Institution, Washington |
(50) | 61.28 | Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
(50) | 61.32 | Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne, Melbourne |
50 | 61.61 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
51 | 63.79 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
52 | 66.25 | Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville |
53 | 67.54 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
54 | 68.37 | Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
