Field Rankings at IDEAS: Economics of Happiness

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Happiness, as of November 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Happiness, these are 183 authors affiliated with 603 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Happiness

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HAP (Economics of Happiness).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.03	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2	3.07	Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
3	3.42	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(4)	4.7	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
4	4.79	Fakultät für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim
5	5.52	RAND, Santa Monica
6	5.79	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(7)	7.47	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
7	9.52	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
8	9.95	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
(9)	12.21	Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(9)	12.32	Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(9)	13.96	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
9	13.96	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
10	14.31	Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
11	14.64	London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
12	14.71	Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
13	15.49	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
14	15.59	World Bank Group, Washington
(15)	20.07	Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
(15)	20.38	Centre for the Study of African Economies (CSAE), Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
15	20.93	Paris-Jourdan Sciences Économiques (PSE), École Normale Supérieure, Paris
(16)	21.45	Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
16	23.33	Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago
17	25.24	Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(18)	25.55	Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
18	28.4	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
19	30.3	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
20	30.34	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
21	31.09	Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
22	31.35	John E. Walker Department of Economics, Clemson University, Clemson
23	32.25	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(24)	33.95	Business and Public Policy Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
(24)	36.01	Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
24	36.24	Owen Graduate School of Management, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
25	37.29	Department of Economics, Indiana University-Purdue University (IUPUI), Indianapolis
26	40.84	Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
27	41.58	DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
28	43.12	Inter-American Development Bank, Washington
29	44.33	Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
30	46.05	Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne, Melbourne

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Happiness

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1.55	Daniel Kahneman
2.	1.57	James P. Smith
3.	3.91	Andrew J. Oswald
4.	4.01	Benno Torgler
5.	4.91	Andrew Clark
6.	5.7	John B Knight
7.	7.11	David G. Blanchflower
8.	7.32	Mark O. Wilhelm
9.	10.03	Roger D. Congleton

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.