| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.2 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
2 | 2.28 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
(3) | 3.41 | Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich |
3 | 4.65 | Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington |
4 | 4.7 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
5 | 6.45 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
6 | 7.75 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
(7) | 9.56 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
7 | 10 | Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
8 | 10.8 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
9 | 11.03 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
10 | 12.74 | World Bank Group, Washington |
11 | 14.64 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
12 | 20.1 | International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
13 | 20.31 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(14) | 20.61 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
14 | 21.08 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
(15) | 21.56 | Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign |
15 | 21.56 | College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign |
16 | 21.86 | Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
17 | 22.89 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
18 | 23.06 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
19 | 23.11 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
20 | 26.27 | Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary |
(21) | 26.38 | Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse |
21 | 28.46 | Department of Economics, New York University, New York City |
(22) | 28.75 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
22 | 28.75 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
23 | 28.82 | Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge |
24 | 29.54 | Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla |
25 | 30.94 | Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich |
26 | 31.39 | AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington |
27 | 32.17 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
28 | 34.88 | Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames |
(29) | 35.05 | Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
29 | 35.07 | Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison |
30 | 36.01 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
31 | 36.65 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
32 | 36.87 | School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
33 | 37.04 | Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis |
34 | 37.15 | Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
(35) | 38.4 | Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City |
35 | 39.3 | ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles |
36 | 40.05 | Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington |
37 | 41.26 | Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville |
38 | 41.89 | Economics and Environmental Sciences, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara |
39 | 42.37 | Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine |
(40) | 42.72 | Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve |
40 | 46.4 | Department of Management, Technology and Economics (D-MTEC), Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (ETHZ), Zürich |
41 | 48.36 | Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville |
42 | 48.54 | School of Management, Yale University, New Haven |
43 | 49.43 | Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford |
44 | 51 | Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames |
45 | 51.06 | Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano |
46 | 51.6 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
47 | 52.16 | Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra |
48 | 54.16 | Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston |
49 | 55.57 | Economics Department, Clark University, Worcester |
50 | 55.59 | Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens |
(51) | 58.15 | Department of Economics and Finance, College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
51 | 58.15 | College of Business, University of Wyoming, Laramie |
(52) | 58.58 | Department of International and European Economic Studies, Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens |
52 | 60.04 | Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Boone |
53 | 63.44 | Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
