RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of November 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 152 authors affiliated with 447 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.35Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.42Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.92Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.23Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.5Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
46.1Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
57.62Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
67.7Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
78.1Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
89.48Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
910.48Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
1012.07ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
1114.68Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)14.8Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1215.74Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1317.19Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1420.49Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(14)20.49Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(15)21.82Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1523.84Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1624.34School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
1724.75School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1825.57School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman
1926.56Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(20)27.71Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2027.71Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2128.09Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2228.1Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.83William R. Johnson
3.3.97Alan Beggs
4.5.37Jean Gabszewicz
5.6.7Charles David Throsby
6.7Kathryn Graddy
7.7.03Matthew Aaron Gentzkow

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.