| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.08 | Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago |
2 | 2.24 | World Bank Group, Washington |
(3) | 3.61 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
3 | 4.56 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
4 | 7.21 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
5 | 8.04 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
6 | 8.37 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
7 | 9.59 | Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz |
(8) | 10.73 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
8 | 11.05 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
9 | 11.23 | RAND, Santa Monica |
10 | 11.51 | Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul |
11 | 14.95 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
12 | 15.07 | Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
13 | 15.1 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
14 | 15.68 | Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo |
(15) | 17.57 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
15 | 18.6 | Singapore Management University, Singapore |
(16) | 20.34 | School of Economics, Singapore Management University, Singapore |
16 | 20.71 | Department of Economics, National University of Singapore, Singapore |
17 | 22.44 | Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago |
18 | 22.51 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
19 | 23.13 | Arndt-Corden Division of Economics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra |
20 | 23.24 | Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
(20) | 23.24 | Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
21 | 24.97 | Department of Economics, Duke University, Durham |
22 | 26.36 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
(23) | 30.5 | School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
23 | 30.5 | Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane |
24 | 31.74 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
25 | 32.77 | Fakulti Ekonomi Dan Pengurusan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang |
26 | 32.82 | International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham |
27 | 33.85 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
(28) | 34.46 | Research Department, International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
28 | 34.52 | Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London |
29 | 34.79 | Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla |
30 | 35.21 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
31 | 35.49 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington |
32 | 36.12 | Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin |
33 | 37.04 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston |
34 | 37.55 | Department of Economics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin |
35 | 40.2 | Asian Development Bank Institute, Asian Development Bank, Tokyo |
36 | 40.55 | Economics Department, University of California-Davis, Davis |
37 | 40.69 | National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS), Tokyo |
38 | 41.42 | Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
39 | 41.6 | Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
40 | 42.74 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
41 | 43.37 | Bank for International Settlements (BIS), Basel |
42 | 44.44 | Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton |
43 | 46.82 | Asian Development Bank, Manila |
44 | 47.22 | Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor |
45 | 51.03 | Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER), Osaka University, Osaka |
(46) | 53.4 | Department of Economics, Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
46 | 53.4 | Tepper School of Business Administration, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh |
(47) | 58.33 | Department of Economics and Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, University of Notre Dame, South Bend |
47 | 58.33 | Faculty of Economics, University of Notre Dame, South Bend |
48 | 58.86 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
49 | 58.96 | Graduate School of International Corporate Strategy, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo |
50 | 59.37 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
51 | 61.06 | College of Business and Economics, Australian National University, Canberra |
52 | 62.14 | Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill |
53 | 62.83 | Department of Economics, George Washington University, Washington |
54 | 63.13 | Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot |
55 | 63.31 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
56 | 63.83 | International Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Genève |
(57) | 64.19 | Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago |
57 | 64.45 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
