RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Resource Economics, as of October 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Resource Economics, these are 78 authors affiliated with 321 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Resource Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-RES (Resource Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.14Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.17Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.91Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.08Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.96Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
36.33Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
(4)8.12School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
48.12Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
510.11Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
610.26Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
711.55Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
811.84Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
915.03Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(10)15.46Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1015.46College of Business, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign
1115.5Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(12)16.82Nationalekonomiska institutionen, Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg
1218.97Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB), Athens
1319.47Department of Economics, University of California-Riverside, Riverside
1419.68Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(15)19.72Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1519.72Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1619.82Handelshögskolan, Göteborgs Universitet, Göteborg

Top 5% authors in the field of Resource Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Peter Nijkamp
2.3.57Ramon Lopez
3.3.62Robert Norman Stavins

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.