RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of October 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 143 authors affiliated with 477 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11.18Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
21.71Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)3.74Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
34.98World Bank Group, Washington
45.86Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(5)6.51Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
57.55Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
68.59Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(6)8.59Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
78.68Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(8)13.54Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
814.41Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
916.35Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1016.4Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1117.07Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1217.08Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1317.5Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
1418.23Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1518.6Department of Economics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan
1620.5Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
1720.62Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(17)20.62Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1821.54Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
1923.18Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2027.34Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
2128.53Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
2229.14Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
2330.73Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.2.07Erik Brynjolfsson
2.2.19John Vickers
3.3.2Philip E. Graves
4.4.28Eduardo M.R.A. Engel
5.4.65Abdullah Yavas
6.4.85David F. Burgess
7.6.92Susana Mourato

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.