Field Rankings at IDEAS: Human Capital & Human Resource Management

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management, as of October 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Human Capital & Human Resource Management, these are 488 authors affiliated with 1046 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-HRM (Human Capital & Human Resource Management).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.08	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2	1.85	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3	5.13	RAND, Santa Monica
4	7.09	Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(4)	7.09	Department of Finance and Business Economics, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
(5)	7.24	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
5	7.91	Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
6	8.79	Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
7	9.72	Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
8	9.88	Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
9	11.52	Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
10	11.88	Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
11	12.1	World Bank Group, Washington
12	12.51	Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
(13)	14.73	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
13	14.73	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
14	16.05	Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
15	16.53	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
16	19.36	Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
17	19.67	Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
18	19.95	Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
19	20.59	Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
(20)	20.98	Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
20	21.73	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
21	22.74	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
22	22.87	Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
23	26.07	Departement d'Économie, Sciences Po, Paris
(23)	26.07	Centre de recherche en Économie (OFCE), Departement d'Économie, Sciences Po, Paris
24	27.58	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
25	29.29	Department of Economics, State University of New York-Buffalo (SUNY), Buffalo
26	29.31	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
27	29.42	Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
28	30.59	Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
29	31.98	ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
30	32.97	Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
31	35.63	Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
32	35.82	Economics Program, Research School of Social Sciences (RSSS), Australian National University, Canberra
33	35.99	Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham
34	36.94	London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
35	37.03	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
36	37.06	Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
37	37.58	Department of Economics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
38	37.87	Economics Department, University of Essex, Colchester
(39)	37.93	European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
39	39.46	DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
(40)	41.07	Center for Economic Policy Studies, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
40	42.07	Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
41	42.23	Instituto de Ciencias Sociales, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA), Madrid
42	45.09	School of Industrial & Labor Relations, Cornell University, Ithaca
43	45.32	Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Aziendali e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano
44	45.76	Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
45	47.34	Department of Economics, University of Texas-Austin, Austin
46	48.55	Faculté des Sciences Économiques et du Droit, Université du Maine, Le Mans
(46)	48.55	Groupe d'Analyse des Itinéraires et Niveaux Salariaux (GAINS), Faculté des Sciences Économiques et du Droit, Université du Maine, Le Mans
47	50.2	Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
48	51.34	Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
49	56.11	Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
(50)	58.37	ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
50	58.37	Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
51	59.66	National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(52)	62.03	Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
52	62.61	Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield

Top 5% authors in the field of Human Capital & Human Resource Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	1	James J. Heckman
2.	3.23	Yves Zenou
3.	3.33	Paul Michael Romer
4.	4.06	Philippe Weil
5.	4.84	Kevin J. Murphy
6.	6.13	Jere Richard Behrman
7.	6.67	Eric A. Hanushek
8.	8.05	Lorne Hugh Carmichael
9.	9.36	David B. Audretsch
10.	10.17	Oded Galor
11.	10.46	Isaac Ehrlich
12.	15.2	Barbara L. Wolfe
13.	15.21	Mark Huggett
14.	17.4	Tim Sass
15.	17.49	W. Craig Riddell
16.	19.38	Paul William Glewwe
17.	20.11	Zoltan J. Acs
18.	20.53	Ignatius J. Horstmann
19.	20.68	Melvyn Glyn Coles
20.	21.21	Sandra E. Black
21.	21.28	Ian Jewitt
22.	22.34	Andres Erosa
23.	22.36	Frédéric Docquier
24.	26.56	Dan Ben-David

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.