| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.03 | Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago |
2 | 2.12 | Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
3 | 6.05 | Economics Department, Brown University, Providence |
4 | 6.1 | Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
5 | 6.21 | Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City |
6 | 6.39 | Economics Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing |
7 | 8.79 | International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington |
(8) | 9.07 | Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
8 | 10.3 | Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge |
9 | 10.51 | Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill |
10 | 11.17 | London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
11 | 11.45 | Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
12 | 12.17 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Davis, Davis |
13 | 12.59 | Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg |
14 | 16.16 | Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park |
15 | 16.53 | Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston |
16 | 17.43 | Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn |
17 | 19.74 | National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge |
18 | 21.39 | Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin |
(19) | 21.89 | Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London |
19 | 22.53 | Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
20 | 22.96 | School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
21 | 23.48 | Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver |
22 | 25.01 | Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley |
23 | 25.5 | Department of Economics, State University of New York-Binghamton (SUNY), Binghamton |
24 | 27.58 | World Bank Group, Washington |
(25) | 28.07 | Economic Research, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco |
25 | 29.45 | Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen |
26 | 29.71 | Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge |
27 | 31.71 | Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto |
28 | 32.13 | DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin |
29 | 32.24 | Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford |
30 | 32.43 | Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College |
(31) | 33.7 | Economics Department, Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris |
31 | 35.06 | Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (CEMFI), Madrid |
32 | 36.64 | Statistics Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa |
33 | 37.05 | Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris |
(33) | 37.05 | Centre de Recherche en Économie et Statistique (CREST), Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques (INSEE), Government of France, Paris |
(34) | 37.42 | Department of Economics, College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
34 | 37.42 | College of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe |
35 | 38.88 | Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry |
36 | 39.71 | Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto |
(37) | 40.23 | Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA), School of Economics, University of Queensland, Brisbane |
37 | 42.08 | Business School, Imperial College, London |
(38) | 42.24 | Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington |
(38) | 42.82 | Groningen Growth and Development Centre (GGDC), Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen |
38 | 42.88 | Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
39 | 43.97 | Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles |
40 | 44.04 | Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam |
41 | 45.5 | Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven |
42 | 46.84 | Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia |
43 | 49.15 | Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot |
(44) | 49.16 | Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
(44) | 49.16 | Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington |
44 | 49.56 | London Business School (LBS), University of London, London |
45 | 51.5 | ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles |
46 | 51.59 | Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn |
47 | 51.78 | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis |
(47) | 51.78 | Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis |
(48) | 53.76 | Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve |
48 | 54.54 | Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London |
49 | 55.82 | Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge |
50 | 56.56 | Department of Economics, Indiana University, Bloomington |
51 | 60.21 | Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela |
52 | 61.19 | Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor |
53 | 61.4 | Economics Department, University of California-Santa Cruz (UCSC), Santa Cruz |
54 | 61.67 | Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York City |
55 | 62.24 | Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), London |
56 | 62.95 | Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
