RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of October 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 148 authors affiliated with 424 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.31Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.37Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.89Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.16Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.54Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
46.02Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
57.29Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
67.75Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
78.57Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
810.24Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
911.29ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
1012.36Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1114.01Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)14.02Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1214.83Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1317.2Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1420.69Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(14)20.69Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(15)20.85Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1524.07Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1624.97School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1725.15School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman
(18)26.77Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
1826.77Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
1927.66School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
2027.72Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
2129.39Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia
(21)29.39Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico, Facultad de Economía y Empresa, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.79William R. Johnson
3.4.51Alan Beggs
4.5.14Jean Gabszewicz
5.6.29Matthew Aaron Gentzkow
6.6.58Charles David Throsby
7.6.84Kathryn Graddy

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.