RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of October 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 190 authors affiliated with 519 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.36RAND, Santa Monica
21.84Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
33.69Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
43.94Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
54.92Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
65.21Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
77.31Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
87.98Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
910.35Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1011.22Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
(11)11.98Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1111.98Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1212.53Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1313.12National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(14)13.67Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1415.98Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
(15)18.7Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1518.89Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1622.28Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1722.62Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1823Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1923.7Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
2024.25Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Napoli
2127.77Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
2228.23Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2329.96International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2430.94Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
(25)32.61ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
2534.03Urban Institute, Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1James P. Smith
2.2.63Robert J. Willis
3.3.15Kenneth J. Arrow
4.4.61David Bloom
5.5.36Michael D. Hurd
6.5.77David Canning
7.7.48Edward Whitehouse
8.7.49Neil Bruce
9.10.2Andrew Michael Jones

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.