RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Project, Program & Portfolio Management, these are 142 authors affiliated with 471 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PPM (Project, Program & Portfolio Management).
RankScoreInstitution
11Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(2)2.81Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
23.87World Bank Group, Washington
35.05Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(4)5.32Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
46.43Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
56.88Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
67.04Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(6)7.04Center for eBusiness, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(7)13.01Economic Growth Center, Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
713.17Department of Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder
814.87Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
914.94Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
1016.14Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam
1116.6Department of Economics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan
1216.95Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1317.48Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1419.16Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(14)19.16Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1519.61Smeal College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University, State College
1620.32Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London
1721.06Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
1822.03Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1924.86Saïd Business School, Oxford University, Oxford
2025.66Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
2127.84Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
2228.52Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
(23)29.49Economics Department, Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro
2329.49Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro

Top 5% authors in the field of Project, Program & Portfolio Management

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.97Erik Brynjolfsson
2.2.14John Vickers
3.3.2Philip E. Graves
4.4.24Eduardo M.R.A. Engel
5.4.69Abdullah Yavas
6.5.35David F. Burgess
7.7.15Susana Mourato

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.