RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 317 authors affiliated with 973 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.09Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.42Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.45Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.64Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
45.03Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
55.4Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
67.28Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
78.09Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
810.8Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
910.88Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(10)12.11Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1012.36Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1112.73Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)12.92Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)17.09Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1217.61Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1319.13Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1419.83World Bank Group, Washington
1520.66Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(16)22.76Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1622.81Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1723.36Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
1824.41Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
1924.9Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
2028.62Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2128.72School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2229.28Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2329.59Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
(24)30.84School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2430.84Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2531.65Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2633.48Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2733.96Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2834.85Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2937.54National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
3037.68Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3139.62Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3240.34Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3340.55School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3441.27Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3541.44Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3641.64Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3744.2Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3845.34Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
3946.4Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
4047.61Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
4147.79Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
4250.48Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
4352.14Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4452.53Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
4552.58London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
(46)52.66Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA), Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4652.66Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4753.31Levy Economics Institute, Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson
4856.01Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.65Ernst Fehr
2.1.89Bruno S. Frey
3.3.96Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.65Paul R. Krugman
5.5.04Dani Rodrik
6.5.16Bruce D. Smith †
7.7.49Douglass C. North
8.9.56Oliver D. Hart
9.10.57János Kornai
10.10.64William Baumol
11.10.92Herbert Gintis
12.11.02Rudiger Dornbusch †
13.13.19John Moore
14.13.88David Laidler
15.15.35Deirdre N. McCloskey

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.