Field Rankings at IDEAS: Energy Economics

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Energy Economics, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Energy Economics, these are 744 authors affiliated with 1019 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Energy Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-ENE (Energy Economics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.17	Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2	2.97	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3	3.37	Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
4	5.07	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
5	5.22	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(6)	6.8	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(6)	8.15	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
6	8.31	Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
(7)	9.61	Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
7	9.85	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
8	11.2	Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
9	12.6	Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
10	13.32	Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
11	14.5	Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
12	15.22	Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
13	15.64	International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
(14)	16.67	Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
14	16.67	Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
15	21.82	Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
16	22.6	University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
16	22.6	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
(16)	22.6	Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM), University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
18	23.92	Economics Department, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
19	24.53	Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
20	24.72	World Bank Group, Washington
21	26.07	Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22	26.21	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
23	26.38	Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
24	26.65	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
25	26.98	Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(26)	27.4	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
26	27.4	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
27	28	International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
28	28.73	AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington
29	33.51	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
30	35.75	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
31	36.77	Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
32	37.63	Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
33	37.84	Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford
34	37.88	DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
35	39.34	Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
36	39.37	Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(37)	42	Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
37	42.88	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
38	43.53	Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary
39	45.55	Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
40	45.89	Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames
(41)	47.38	Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
41	47.65	Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
42	49.21	Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine
43	49.58	Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
(44)	49.63	Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
44	50.78	Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
45	50.84	Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
46	54.18	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
47	54.56	Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
48	54.9	Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
49	57.34	CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
50	58.94	Economics and Environmental Sciences, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science & Management, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara

Top 5% authors in the field of Energy Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	2.67	David M Newbery
2.	3.75	Peter Nijkamp
3.	3.77	James Hamilton
4.	4.01	Adam Jaffe
5.	5.61	Paul Joskow
6.	6.18	Lutz Kilian
7.	6.39	Martin L. Weitzman
8.	7.05	Severin Borenstein
9.	8.26	Nathan Balke
10.	8.92	Richard S.J. Tol
11.	9.08	Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
12.	11.46	Robert W. Hahn
13.	11.99	William D. Nordhaus
14.	12.72	Robert S. Pindyck
15.	15.76	Kenneth J. Arrow
16.	16.05	Robert H. Porter
17.	18.34	Geoffrey Heal
18.	19.07	Charles D. Kolstad
19.	19.4	Gilbert Metcalf
20.	19.5	Richard G. Newell
21.	20.06	Robert Norman Stavins
22.	20.08	Wallace E. Oates
23.	21.54	Ian Parry
24.	23.01	Michael Gerald Pollitt
25.	23.44	Karen Palmer
26.	24.5	Larry S. Karp
27.	25.41	Dallas Burtraw
28.	26.22	William A. Pizer
29.	26.66	Brian R. Copeland
30.	26.7	Carlo Carraro
31.	29.52	Richard J. Gilbert
32.	29.83	Sjak Smulders
33.	30.41	John Thornton
34.	30.51	Kenneth A. Small
35.	32.12	James Bushnell
36.	33.7	Wayne B. Gray
37.	33.87	Richard John Green

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.