RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 143 authors affiliated with 409 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.31Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.37Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.89Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.15Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.42Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
46.21Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
57.11Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
67.56Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
78.71Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
810.18Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
911.76ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
1012.41Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1113.36Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)14.57Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1215.01Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1317.68Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
(14)20.13Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1420.34Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(14)20.34Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
1523.66Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1624.66School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1724.82School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman
1825.95School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
1927.69Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(20)28.2Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
2028.2Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.2.75William R. Johnson
3.4.54Alan Beggs
4.5.24Jean Gabszewicz
5.6.17Matthew Aaron Gentzkow
6.6.44Charles David Throsby
7.6.62Kathryn Graddy

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.