RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of September 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 189 authors affiliated with 506 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.3RAND, Santa Monica
21.91Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
33.66Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
44.15Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
54.71Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
65.07Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
77.37Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
87.97Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
910.79Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1011.08Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
1111.8Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(11)11.8Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1212.53Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1313.21National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(14)13.94Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1415.93Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
(15)16.91Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1518.36Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1622.27Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1723.11Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1823.8Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1924.29Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
2024.34Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Napoli
2126.73Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
2228.13Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2328.82International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2429.82Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
(25)31.93ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
2532.85Urban Institute, Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1James P. Smith
2.2.72Robert J. Willis
3.3.07Kenneth J. Arrow
4.4.56David Bloom
5.5.25Michael D. Hurd
6.5.86David Canning
7.7.37Neil Bruce
8.7.54Edward Whitehouse
9.11.56Andrew Michael Jones

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.