Field Rankings at IDEAS: Technology & Industrial Dynamics

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics, as of August 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Technology & Industrial Dynamics, these are 463 authors affiliated with 914 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-TID (Technology & Industrial Dynamics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.03	Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
2	2.93	Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3	5.63	London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
4	5.89	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
5	7.21	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
(6)	7.24	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
6	7.46	International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
7	7.63	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
8	7.78	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(9)	10.23	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
9	10.98	Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
10	11.03	Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
11	12.5	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
12	15.07	Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
13	15.22	Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
14	15.83	School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
15	15.89	Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies (KITeS/CESPRI), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milano
(16)	16.22	Economics Department, London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
16	16.76	United Nations University-Maastricht Economic Research Institute of Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), Maastricht
17	17.1	National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
18	17.83	Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
19	20.16	Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Jena
20	20.24	Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
21	21.22	Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
22	21.34	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
23	23.78	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
24	24.76	Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
25	25.65	Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
26	25.88	Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
27	26.33	Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
28	27.7	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
29	27.9	Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(30)	30.87	Management Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
30	30.99	Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), Stanford University, Palo Alto
31	35.82	Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
(32)	35.95	Economic Analysis & Policy Group (EAP), Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
32	36.74	Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
(33)	37.62	Finance Unit, Harvard Business School, Harvard University, Cambridge
33	37.86	Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa
34	38.37	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
35	40.1	Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
36	41.29	Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
37	41.77	Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
(38)	43.17	Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(38)	43.18	Strategy and Business Economics Division, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
38	44.36	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
39	44.42	Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, San Francisco
40	44.96	Faculdade de Economia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa
(41)	46.84	Vakgroep Algemene Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
41	48.09	Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
42	48.71	Department of Economics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill
(43)	50.97	Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEPR), Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
(43)	51.17	Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
43	52.78	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena
44	56.1	Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
(45)	57.42	International Economics Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
45	58.08	Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm

Top 5% authors in the field of Technology & Industrial Dynamics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	2.8	Zvi Griliches †
2.	3.21	Adam Jaffe
3.	3.36	Paul Michael Romer
4.	4.7	Richard R. Nelson
5.	4.88	Michael H. Riordan
6.	5.23	Joachim Wagner
7.	5.86	Bronwyn Hughes Hall
8.	6.01	Rudiger Dornbusch †
9.	8.39	Manuel Trajtenberg
10.	10.29	Danny Quah
11.	10.83	Steven Klepper
12.	11.44	Rebecca M. Henderson
13.	11.45	David B. Audretsch
14.	11.88	Joseph Farrell
15.	12.41	Sidney Winter
16.	14.48	Richard Schmalensee
17.	16.62	Michael Darby
18.	16.84	Michael L. Katz
19.	16.95	Josh Lerner
20.	17.15	Paul A. Geroski †
21.	18.07	Daron Acemoglu
22.	19.69	James Bradford DeLong
23.	20	Franco Malerba

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.