Field Rankings at IDEAS: Energy Economics

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Energy Economics, as of August 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Energy Economics, these are 729 authors affiliated with 992 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Energy Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-ENE (Energy Economics).

Rank	Score	Institution
1	1.17	Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2	3	Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3	3.34	Resources for the Future (RFF), Washington
4	5.2	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
5	5.69	Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(6)	7.3	Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
6	7.64	Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
(7)	8.39	Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(7)	9.71	Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
7	10.14	Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
8	11.06	Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
9	12.19	Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
10	13.77	Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
11	14.45	Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
12	15.21	Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
13	15.58	International Business School, Brandeis University, Waltham
(14)	16.49	Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
14	16.49	Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
15	17.37	International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
16	21.96	University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(16)	21.96	Center for the Study of Energy Markets (CSEM), University of California Energy Institute (UCEI), University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
17	22.31	Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
18	23.63	Department of Economics, Southern Methodist University, Dallas
19	24.43	Economics Department, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
20	24.76	Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
21	24.86	World Bank Group, Washington
22	25.69	Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
23	26.29	Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
24	26.75	Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
25	27.23	Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
26	27.26	Economics Department, Yale University, New Haven
(27)	28.33	School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
27	28.33	Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
28	28.73	AEI-Brookings Joint Institute for Regulatory Studies, Washington
29	34.52	Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford
30	34.75	Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
31	35.31	Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
32	38.52	Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
33	38.63	DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung), Berlin
34	38.99	Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
35	39.16	Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(36)	42.44	Center for Business and Government, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
36	44.02	Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
37	44.51	Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
38	46.27	Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames
(39)	46.39	Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
39	48.53	Department of Economics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
40	48.8	Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
(41)	48.9	Laboratoire d'Économie des Ressources Naturelles (LERNA), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
41	49.08	Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary
42	49.72	Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
43	50.09	Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milano
44	50.17	Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
(45)	51.57	Departement Algemene Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg
45	51.8	Department of Economics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine
46	53.42	Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
47	55.12	Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
48	55.16	Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo
49	55.62	Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris

Top 5% authors in the field of Energy Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.

Rank	Score	Author
1.	2.63	David M Newbery
2.	3.74	Peter Nijkamp
3.	3.85	James Hamilton
4.	4.09	Adam Jaffe
5.	5.81	Paul Joskow
6.	6.06	Lutz Kilian
7.	6.25	Severin Borenstein
8.	6.61	Martin L. Weitzman
9.	8.5	Nathan Balke
10.	8.78	Mohsen Bahmani-Oskooee
11.	10.14	Richard S.J. Tol
12.	11.29	Robert W. Hahn
13.	12.33	William D. Nordhaus
14.	12.71	Robert S. Pindyck
15.	15.71	Kenneth J. Arrow
16.	16.26	Robert H. Porter
17.	17	Gilbert Metcalf
18.	17.97	Geoffrey Heal
19.	18.38	Charles D. Kolstad
20.	19.09	Richard G. Newell
21.	19.25	Robert Norman Stavins
22.	20.4	Wallace E. Oates
23.	21.69	Ian Parry
24.	23.59	Michael Gerald Pollitt
25.	23.9	Larry S. Karp
26.	24.09	Dallas Burtraw
27.	25.07	Karen Palmer
28.	26.06	William A. Pizer
29.	27.18	Brian R. Copeland
30.	28.52	Sjak Smulders
31.	29.8	Carlo Carraro
32.	30.27	Richard J. Gilbert
33.	31.68	Wayne B. Gray
34.	31.81	James Bushnell
35.	32.41	Richard John Green
36.	32.77	Kenneth A. Small

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

Citations from CitEc project by José Manuel Barrueco Cruz, University of Valencia, Spain. Hardware provided by Technical University of Valencia, Spain.
Abstract views and downloads statistics from LogEc project by Sune Karlsson, Örebro University, Sweden.
Author registration by Ivan Kumanov, Minsk, Belarus.
Institutions database and ranking computations by Christian Zimmermann, University of Connecticut.
RePEc has been initiated by Thomas Krichel, Long Island University.

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.