| Rank | Score | Institution |
1 | 1.77 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California (USA) |
2 | 1.88 | International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
3 | 1.92 | Department of Economics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa (USA) |
4 | 3.54 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland (USA) |
5 | 6.56 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (USA) |
6 | 7.12 | Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York (USA) |
7 | 7.57 | Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan (USA) |
8 | 8.13 | Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana (USA) |
9 | 8.5 | Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD), Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa (USA) |
10 | 8.52 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina (USA) |
11 | 10.15 | Department of Applied Economics, College of Agricultural, Food, and Environmental Sciences, University of Minnesota-St. Paul, St. Paul, Minnesota (USA) |
12 | 11.12 | Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom |
13 | 13.54 | Centre for International Economic Studies, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia |
14 | 14.35 | Department of Agricultural Economics and Management, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel |
15 | 14.85 | Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin (USA) |
16 | 15.42 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona (USA) |
17 | 15.53 | Afdeling Ontwikkelings Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands |
18 | 19.3 | Département d'Économie et Sociologie Rurales, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Ivry, France |
19 | 19.67 | Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois (USA) |
20 | 19.97 | Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas (USA) |
21 | 20.59 | Fakulti Ekonomi Dan Pengurusan, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia |
22 | 20.63 | Department of Resource Economics, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, Nevada (USA) |
23 | 22.05 | Department of Agricultural Economics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma (USA) |
24 | 22.24 | Economic Research Service, Department of Agriculture, Government of the United States, Washington, District of Columbia (USA) |
25 | 25.58 | Department of Applied Economics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah (USA) |
26 | 25.91 | Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (USA) |
27 | 28.25 | Laboratoire d'Économie Appliquée de Grenoble, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Grenoble, France |
28 | 28.43 | Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, University of California-Oakland, Oakland, California (USA) |
29 | 28.84 | Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska (USA) |
30 | 29.16 | Departments of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon (USA) |
31 | 31.84 | Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut (USA) |
32 | 33.97 | Department of Agricultural and Food Economics, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom |
The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.
Credits:
