RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of August 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 178 authors affiliated with 485 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07RAND, Santa Monica
23.08Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
23.08Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
44.07Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
54.08Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
66.2Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
76.47Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
89.08Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
99.68Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
1010.7Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1110.85National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(12)12.57Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1213.12Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
1315.4Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(14)15.46Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1420.28Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1520.41Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1620.98Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(16)20.98Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1721.03Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1821.56Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1924.49Economics Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
2025.07Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2125.69Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
2226.32Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Napoli
2326.8International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
2428.41Urban Institute, Washington

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1James P. Smith
2.2.55Kenneth J. Arrow
3.3.97Robert J. Willis
4.4.34David Bloom
5.5.02Michael D. Hurd
6.5.35David Canning
7.6.96Neil Bruce
8.7.43Edward Whitehouse

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.