RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Sociology of Economics, as of July 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Sociology of Economics, these are 145 authors affiliated with 436 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Sociology of Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-SOG (Sociology of Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.37Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
22.27Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.34Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.25Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
44.93Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
58.51Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
68.65Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
78.7Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
89.47Department of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City
99.83Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
(10)11.64School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1011.64Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1112.07Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1212.16Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1312.9ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
(14)14.65Department of Finance and Economics, School of Management, Boston University, Boston
1414.65School of Management, Boston University, Boston
(15)17.82European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
1517.93Department of Public Policy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
1618.72Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(17)20.17Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1720.52National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
1821.6Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
1924.63Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
2026.37Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
2126.67Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

Top 5% authors in the field of Sociology of Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.12Bruno S. Frey
2.2.27Paul A. Samuelson
3.3.89John Geweke
4.4.65Richard S.J. Tol
5.5.44Andrew J. Oswald
6.6.17Shulamit Kahn
7.6.78Dan Ben-David

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.