RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 20% Institutions and Economists in Russia, as of July 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Russia, there are 84 authors affiliated with 24 institutions. Note that authors affiliated only with institutions in this region that are not listed in EDIRC cannot be ranked. Authors with multiple affiliations are attributed to each according to a formula.

All institutions in this region.

Top 20% institutions in Russia

RankScoreW.RankInstitution
11[1]New Economic School (NES), Moscow
(2)2[2]Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
23.71[2]Higher School of Economics, Moscow
33.8[3]Economics Education and Research Consortium (EERC), Moscow
45.86[4]Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow

Top 20% authors in Russia

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who claimed some affiliation in this region, and this affiliation is listed in
EDIRC.
RankScoreW.RankAuthorAffiliated with (in this region)
1.1.97[3]Ekaterina Zhuravskaya New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
2.2.31[4]Maxim Boyko New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
3.3.22[6]Konstantin Sonin New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
4.3.53[8]Sergei Guriev New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
5.5.96[10]Stanislav Anatolyev New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
6.6.2[5]Aleh Tsyvinski New Economic School (NES), Moscow
7.7.37[2]Ivan O. Kitov
8.7.59[12]Shlomo Weber New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Economics Education and Research Consortium (EERC), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
9.7.69[1]Michael Golosov New Economic School (NES), Moscow
10.11.01[13]Nikolai S. Kukushkin Russian Academy of Sciences
11.12.05[15]Andrei Alexandrovich Rachinsky New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
12.12.27[14]Kirill Sossounov New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Faculty of Economics, Higher School of Economics, Moscow
Higher School of Economics, Moscow
Centre for Advanced Studies, Higher School of Economics, Moscow
13.14.08[16]Grigory Kosenok New Economic School (NES), Moscow
14.15.25[21]Vladimir Gimpelson Higher School of Economics, Moscow
15.15.37[18]Natalya Volchkova New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow
16.15.77[22]Alexei Goriaev New Economic School (NES), Moscow
Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR), New Economic School (NES), Moscow

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.