RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of July 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 312 authors affiliated with 960 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.42Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.45Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.53Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.32Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.29Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
68.07Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
79.44Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
810.16Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
910.37Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1011.07Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.41Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)12.53Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)13.16Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)14.07Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1218.03Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1318.93World Bank Group, Washington
1419.59Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1520.85Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1621.12Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(17)22.23Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1722.92Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
1824.7Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1925.04Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
2026.6Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2127.86School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2228.14Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2328.9Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
(24)30.56School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2430.56Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2531.42Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2632.36Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2734.01Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2835.8Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2935.81School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3035.95Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3136.63National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
3238.43Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3339Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3439.01Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3542.01Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3642.13Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3742.66Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3844.71Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam
3945.08London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
4046.16Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
4146.47Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
4247.5Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
4350.33Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
(44)50.44Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA), Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4450.44Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4550.5Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
4653.27Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4754.69Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College
4854.72Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.7Ernst Fehr
2.1.88Bruno S. Frey
3.3.83Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.26Paul R. Krugman
5.4.95Dani Rodrik
6.5.59Bruce D. Smith †
7.7.69Douglass C. North
8.9.1Oliver D. Hart
9.10.37Herbert Gintis
10.10.9William Baumol
11.11.3Rudiger Dornbusch †
12.11.5János Kornai
13.12.96John Moore
14.14.77Deirdre N. McCloskey
15.15.35David Laidler

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.