RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Cultural Economics, as of July 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Cultural Economics, these are 139 authors affiliated with 392 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Cultural Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-CUL (Cultural Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.34Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(2)2.4Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
22.9Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(3)4.14Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
35.59Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
46.7Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
57Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
67.24Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
79.66Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
810.06ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
911.68Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1012.38Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
(11)12.76Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
(11)15.43Applied Economics Workshop, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1116.32Norges Handelshøyskole (NHH), Bergen
1217.88Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
(12)17.88Department of Economics, Division of Economic and Financial Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney
1321.33School of Public Affairs, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1421.58Department of Economics, Brandeis University, Waltham
1521.99School of Management, Yale University, New Haven
(16)23.06Industrial Relations Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1623.28School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman
1724.69Walter A. Haas School of Business, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
(18)25.31European Centre for Advanced Research in Economics and Statistics (ECARES), ECORE, Bruxelles
(18)27.21Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1827.21Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1928.4Tinbergen Instituut, Amsterdam

Top 5% authors in the field of Cultural Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1Bruno S. Frey
2.3.04William R. Johnson
3.4.42Alan Beggs
4.5.18Matthew Aaron Gentzkow
5.5.49Jean Gabszewicz
6.6.18Charles David Throsby

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.