RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Economics of Ageing, as of July 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Economics of Ageing, these are 173 authors affiliated with 465 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Economics of Ageing

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-AGE (Economics of Ageing).
RankScoreInstitution
11.07RAND, Santa Monica
23.04Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
33.09Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
43.96Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge
53.99Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
65.79Geary Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin
78.28Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
89.2Department of Economics, University of Washington, Seattle
99.92Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
1010.23National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
(11)11.92Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques (OCDE), Paris
1111.94Olin School of Business, Washington University, St. Louis
1213.23Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(13)14.85Labor and Population Program, RAND, Santa Monica
1318.74Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
1418.77Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
1518.8Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
(15)18.8Research Program in Development Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1619.86Economics Department, Dartmouth College, Hanover
1720.56Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
1821.88Center for Retirement Research (CRR), Boston College, Chestnut Hill
1923.92Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2024.32Urban Institute, Washington
2126.44International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
(22)28.67ESRC Centre for the Microeconomic Analysis of Public Policy (CPP), Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), London
(22)28.93Finance Department, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
2228.93Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City
2329.13Centro Studi di Economia e Finanza (CSEF), Napoli

Top 5% authors in the field of Economics of Ageing

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.98Robert J. Willis
2.2.51David Bloom
3.3.08Michael D. Hurd
4.3.25David Canning
5.4.92Neil Bruce
6.5.74Edward Whitehouse
7.8.01Timothy Aaron Waidmann
8.10.07Arie Kapteyn

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.