RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Utility Models & Prospect Theory, these are 355 authors affiliated with 831 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-UPT (Utility Models & Prospect Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.05Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
21.89Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)2.95Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
35.75Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.76Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
58.02Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
68.61Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
68.61London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
89.41Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
910.98School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
1012.17Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
(11)14.76School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
1014.76Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
(12)16.31Economics Group, Nuffield College, Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1217.8Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
1317.82Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1419.6Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
1519.64Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
1621.21Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
1721.43Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
(18)22.46Finance Department, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1822.91Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
1923.11School of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
2023.21Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
2124.16Economics Department, Queen's University, Kingston
2226.56Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
2327.6School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
(24)27.8Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
2428.11Department of Economics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby
(25)30.53Department of Finance, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
(25)32.49Centre for Economic Performance (CEP), London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
2533Centre de Recerca en Economia Internacional (CREI), Barcelona
2633.15Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris
2733.43Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus
2833.46Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
2933.94Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3034.15Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
(31)35.47Foerder Institute for Economic Research, Eitan Berglas School of Economics, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv
3136.36ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
3237.39Department of Economics, York University, Toronto
(33)37.58Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
3338.97Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
3440.23Economics Department, Georgetown University, Washington
3540.51Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3641.63Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
3741.71International Monetary Fund (IMF), Washington
3842.21Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee
3943.03Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
4043.58Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
4143.59Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge

Top 5% authors in the field of Utility Models & Prospect Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.07Bruno S. Frey
2.3.03John Moore
3.6.2Richard S.J. Tol
4.6.32Peter E. Rossi
5.6.39Benno Torgler
6.6.68Arthur John Robson
7.6.9Robert Sugden
8.7.72Andrew J. Oswald
9.7.95David Schmeidler
10.9.56Chris D Orme
11.11.32Mark Huggett
12.11.66Richard E. Just
13.11.96Richard Layard
14.12.06Uzi Segal
15.13.54Sujoy Mukerji
16.13.81Dan Usher
17.13.93Edi Karni

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.