RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Post Keynesian Economics, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Post Keynesian Economics, these are 311 authors affiliated with 960 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-PKE (Post Keynesian Economics).
RankScoreInstitution
11.04Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
22.42Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.45Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.49Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
45.29Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
57.21Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
68.47Department of Economics, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley
79.24Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
810.19Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
910.56Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton
1010.93Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
1112.36Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
(12)12.46Center for International Development, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge
(12)13.21Afdeling Ruimtelijke Economie, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
(12)14.18Finance & Economics Department, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University, New York City
1217.76Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
1318.74World Bank Group, Washington
1419.37Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1520.74Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
1620.98Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(17)21.57Economics Research, World Bank Group, Washington
1723.38Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe
1824.5Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago
1925.02Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Lüneburg
2026.25Booth School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago
2127.83Department of Economics, University of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury
2229.04Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
2329.11School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
(24)30.45School of Economics and Finance, Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2330.45Faculty of Business, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane
2531.68Federal Reserve Board (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System), Washington
2632.55Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2734.34Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2834.88Cambridge Finance, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
2935.69School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, New York City
3036.37National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge
3136.79Economics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
3238.66Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3338.85Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3439.23Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
3539.46Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago
3642.52Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
3743.29London School of Economics (LSE), University of London, London
3844.43Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
3944.44Department of Economics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
4045.43Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
4145.92Department of Economics, University of Stirling, Stirling
4249.46Department of Economics, Middlebury College, Middlebury
(43)49.55Economics and Statistics Administration (ESA), Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4249.55Department of Commerce, Government of the United States, Washington
4451.21Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
4552.11Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis
4653.81Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, State College
4755.04Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel/Zürich
4856.52Department of Economics, University of Maryland, College Park

Top 5% authors in the field of Post Keynesian Economics

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.59Ernst Fehr
2.2.04Bruno S. Frey
3.3.85Paul A. Samuelson
4.4.52Paul R. Krugman
5.4.76Dani Rodrik
6.5.46Bruce D. Smith †
7.7.59Douglass C. North
8.9.37Oliver D. Hart
9.10.36Rudiger Dornbusch †
10.10.67William Baumol
11.10.91Herbert Gintis
12.11.56János Kornai
13.13.38John Moore
14.14.66Deirdre N. McCloskey
15.15.1David Laidler

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.