RePEc Click here to visit UConn Economics IDEAS

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Top 5% Institutions and Economists in the Field of Game Theory, as of June 2009

This page shows one of the many rankings computed with RePEc data. They are based on data about authors who have registered with the RePEc Author Service, institutions listed on EDIRC, bibliographic data collected by RePEc, citation analysis performed by CitEc and popularity data compiled by LogEc. To find more rankings, historical data and detailed methodology, click here. Or see the ranking FAQ. For Game Theory, these are 620 authors affiliated with 783 institutions.
All authors classified in this field.

Top 5% institutions in the field of Game Theory

The scores of institutions in each field are determined by a weighted sum of all authors affiliated with the respective institutions. The weights are determined, for each author, by the proportion of all working papers announced in NEP that have also been announced in NEP-GTH (Game Theory).
RankScoreInstitution
11.84Department of Economics, Stanford University, Palo Alto
22.08Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
(3)3.28Institut für Empirische Wirtschaftsforschung (IEW), Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakutät, Universität Zürich, Zürich
34.76Department of Economics, University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla
45.06Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge
55.62Department of Economics, University of Chicago, Chicago
66.61Department of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton
78.09ECORE, Louvain/Bruxelles
89.43Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem
911.96Department of Economics, Oxford University, Oxford
1012.46Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
1113.48Department of Economics, Washington University, St. Louis
(12)13.67Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE), ECORE, Louvain-la-Neuve
1216.32Wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachbereich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn
1316.41Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Palo Alto
1416.99Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
1517.6Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
1618.99Department of Economics, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles
1719.42Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), Dublin
1820.25Department of Economics, Northwestern University, Evanston
1921.08Department of Economics, University College London (UCL), University of London, London
(20)21.55Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), Toulouse
(20)22.9Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science (CMS-EMS), Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston
2024.04Division of Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
2125.3Department of Economics, University of Warwick, Coventry
2226.07Department of Economics, New York University, New York City
2328.16Hoover Institution on War Revolution & Peace, Stanford University, Palo Alto
2428.93Institutet för Näringslivsforskning (IFN), Stockholm
2529.87Department of Economics, Boston University, Boston
2631.31School of Economics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
2733.7School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich
2835.4Economics Department, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge
2935.83Department of Economics, University of California-Santa Barbara (UCSB), Santa Barbara
3036.15Economics Department, Brown University, Providence
3138.09Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville
3238.2Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, New Haven
3340.49CentER for Economic Research, Universiteit van Tilburg (Katholieke Universiteit Brabant), Tilburg
3441.08Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
3541.6Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Bedrijfskunde, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht
3642.38Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto
3742.85Department of Economics, School of Arts and Sciences, Columbia University, New York City
3843.39Department of Economics, Florida State University, Tallahassee
(39)43.55Laboratory for Experimental Economics and Political Science, Division of Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
3945.01Centre d'Économie de la Sorbonne, Université Paris 1 (Panthéon-Sorbonne), Paris

Top 5% authors in the field of Game Theory

This ranking is based on registered authors only, and only those who are classified within
this field. Authors can register at the RePEc Author Service.
RankScoreAuthor
1.1.16Ernst Fehr
2.2.68Paul Milgrom
3.3.28Drew Fudenberg
4.5.4Stephen Morris
5.6.1Vincent P. Crawford
6.7.52Matthew O. Jackson
7.7.82David Knudsen Levine
8.8.35Robert Butler Wilson
9.8.39Colin Camerer
10.10.34Ehud Kalai
11.11.2Sergiu Hart
12.13.84Robert Sugden
13.15.95George J. Mailath
14.16.28Philip J. Reny
15.17.69Philippe Jehiel
16.18.05Ted Bergstrom
17.18.09Giacomo Bonanno
18.18.95Mamoru Kaneko
19.20.14Martin Shubik
20.20.4Steven J. Brams
21.21.76H. Peyton Young
22.24.63James Andreoni
23.24.66Jacques Crémer
24.24.93Benny Moldovanu
25.25.24Bezalel Peleg
26.25.68Alvin E. Roth
27.25.74Charles A. Holt
28.26.23R. Mark Isaac
29.26.68Joel Sobel
30.27.02Lin Zhou
31.27.05Olivier Compte

The data presented here is experimental. It is based on a limited sample of the research output in Economics and Finance. Only material catalogued in RePEc is considered. For any citation based criterion, only works that could be parsed by the CitEc project are considered. For any ranking of people, only those registered with the RePEc Author Service can be taken into account. And for rankings of institutions, only those listed in EDIRC and claimed as affiliation by the respective, registered authors can be measured. Thus, this list is by no means based on a complete sample. You can help making this more comprehensive by encouraging more publications to be listed (instructions) and more authors to register (form). For more details on the various rankings that are available as well for documentation, follow this link.

Credits:

We do our best, but we cannot exclude errors.